It could be, too!

I'm sure they're both correct. Maybe it depends on where the speaker is from?

I had a friend in undergrad who was British and always phrased it like "cuppa".

"I could reeeeally go for a cuppa" she would say like every other hour.

No wonder!

Now I feel dumb trying to press powder into my veins. I should have mixed it with water first, duh.

I think another proper word/phrase is "fancy a cuppa"

Moist people don't mind the occasional typo

Probably helped lower some risk, too.

Wasn't there some controversy with who had the first flying machine? There was supposedly some guy in CT that flew an aircraft before the brothers?

EDIT - found this article Three states bicker over 'first in flight' claim

You are in good company here. I feel that Lemmy has adopted every damn Linux user on the planet, lol.

I haven't been this pressured into using Linux since living with my parents. My father is quite the power user for decades and all the jargon and humor here he appreciates.

I believe it can work inwardly and be separate from politics. In reality, though, I don't think it can.

I honestly want you to enumerate them because discussion helps and is an opportunity to progress the ideas. Just because we disagree, doesn't mean we shouldn't share the ideas. I enjoy discussion and I try hard to not be inflammatory or rude.

You should tell me where the "flags" are so I can look back and think on it.

To summarize:

1. The article discusses a CDC report about stats on children which includes adults, and discusses homicides of black inner city adolescents, and suicides of white adolelescents that are on the rise since the pandemic. The loss of life is terrible.

2. Self defense is a right, not a hobby. The potential loss of life is terrible.

3. Between #1 and #2, you and I have to navigate to find a solution that satisfies both of us.

4. We can agree that any life lost to anything is too much.

I wish you the best.

Yeah, it's misleading. Especially considering the hot topic use of firearms.

Regardless of which side of the fence you sit on, we can agree that data should be free of the organization present here. The discussion isn't helped by this interpretation of the interpretation and it surely needs helping.