How do you know it's just a bookshelf?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA Trump knowing how to play checkers hahahahaha
If you're trolling, you're doing a great job.
Thank you for reducing your meat consumption. I know you can go all the way with it.
How do you know it's the same people?
The person who wrote this blog has no brain wrinkles.
The article says that according to the guy who sued him, he had accepted the terms of a contract through text message.
However, it doesn't say that according to the guy that sued him, he had accepted a contract specifically through the sending of 👍 in a text message in the past.
In this particular case the defendant had a history of using 👍to accept a contract. Had done it NP a dozen times before
The article doesn’t say that. It says that according to the guy who sued him, he used text message before to accept a contract. It doesn’t say that he had ever responded to a contract with a thumbs up emoji before.
“Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order.”
No mention of thumbs up emoji having been used prior to this particular thumbs up emoji incident.
People who do that are such losers. Bottom of the barrel.
NO! I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IT! (WARIO STYLE "MMEEEEEEEHHHHHH") (runs away).
Yes, I read it. Did you? It said:
"Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order."
It does not say that the argument was made that he previously agreed to a contract through text message _ by sending a single 👍_.
This is the context we have through the article, and so no, a single emoji as a binding contract is ridiculous.
Hypnoctopus
joined 1 year ago
3 videos a day for 5.5 months (about 167 days). That's 500 videos. 500 x $25 = $12500, not $1250.
I have no clue if it's feasible to make three videos a day for 5.5 months, but I guess if the length of the video doesn't matter then It must be doable.
It could be worth it if they can also make money through other companies for the same videos. Plus if they're popular enough that Amazon is paying them then they must already be making ad revenue or something.
I don't know. I'm not a pro, just spitballing.