[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, there have been a lot of war games that currently show China losing but by a small margin. It's likely that in less than a decade China would win by a small margin. According to many US generals.

So while your wrong, China almost certainly could take Taiwan in less than a decade, I would argue that there's no chance in hell they would do it. Winning by a small margin here means millions if deaths if not nuclear war. This would be massacre that would make both Israel and Russia's violence look down right peaceful.

And it's not like China hasn't shown it's hand in what it would do. War is not China's goal, a blockade is.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Well for one there's no evidence of murder. That's actually my whole point. For all the complaining, the people who actually visited, the UN and Muslim nations have not seen any evidence of killing.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Wow, so stupid. These were riots. Are you saying we didn't know the leaders of the Jan 6th riots or BLM riots? They literally stood up with megaphones.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Nothing you said is correct. I literally sent you a document that explains how it works. Your ignorance is astounding.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I’m so hurt right now

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Wait, do you not know there's domestic terrorism? Do you think the Jan 6th rioters used foreign weapons? BLM? Yet the police still had to deal with them, sometimes violently.

I don't get where you are getting this foreign terrorist idea from

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

There's no way to distinguish the damage. It would be like comparing ar-15 with m-16. It's impossible. And thus, you've proven why China simply says fuck you.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

... Are you dumb? AR-15 is the civilian moniker for M-16. You know that right? There's no way to distinguish the damage they do from one another.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Chinese people used Chinese weapons yes. Just like Americans user AR-15s. What is your point?

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What are you talking about, of course they were damaged with Chinese weaponry. They're in China. I already told you at the time weapons weren't as restricted, the people got access to Chinese weaponry. Why the fuck would Chinese protestors use other weaponry?

*Edit: Did you know BLM protestors used AR-15s? Where was the non-American weaponry? No PROOF THEREFORE BLM DIDN'T HAPPEN. You absolute dunce.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

There are lots of photos of burnt out armor from the protestors attacks by western journalists.

Their argument is if you see those images of destroyed armor taken by foreign nationals and still think that some how China did it, well fuck you. You're too god damn stupid to talk to.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Again only circumstantial evidence against China. You keep lying and saying China does these things even though the UN says there is no evidence.

*Edit: Also you keep saying we shouldn't trust genocidal powers, but you 100% absolutely believe the US when they say China is just as bad. Since it's literally only the US saying it and forcing others to agree. Some how, the projection US puts on China is true to you, but nothing else? WTF is wrong with you?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Joncash2

joined 1 year ago