I don’t think that controversy about Trump is concerning in any way. The AI could be interesting instead.
Are hiring managers actually less likely to hire women if they ask for market-rate pay, as opposed to men when they do the same?
If instead of giving passive aggressive replies you would spend a moment to reflect on what I wrote you would understand that ChatGPT reflect the reality, including any bias. In short the answer is yes with high probability.
LLMs do not give the correct answer, just the most probable sequence of words based on the training.
That kind of studies (because there are hundreds) highlight two things:
1- LLMs could be incorrect, biased, or give fake information (the so called hallucinations). 2- the previous point stems from the training material proving the existence of bias in the society.
In other words, having an LLM recommending lower salaries for women is a proof that there is a gender gap.
You sort of described RAG. It can improve alignment, but the training is hard to overcome.
See Grok that bounces from “woke” results to “full nazi” without hitting the mid point desired by Musk.
Of course, but in this case “being an alternative” really depends on the goal. To produce content they may be all valid, to monetise content there will be differences, but to consume content none is really comparable to YouTube.
More because of US regression (note: it was a joke)
There is also Vimeo.
However, none of these is a true alternative to YouTube in terms of content.
It happened to me at work and it was a very bad period. Even if it ended well for me, no forgiveness.
Yeah, I noticed the downvotes. Who cares? 😁