Great comment on there links two code comment threads I found significant and interesting.
While it was primarily about ethics, it should also be noted that the code was described as being "impressively wrong", as well as not actually compiling. I mean, it basically checked if a theme was dark by if it had the word "dark" in the name - which is not a good heuristic - when better ways of doing it exist.
What do you mean by "instead of watching"? OP links to a text article.
I still prefer your MDN link though. Concise, and a more readable layout. Dunno why OP felt the need to increase the font size that much into a wide layout.
How do you conclude from unrealistic demands to no interest in peace?
What do you think the prospects of short and long-term peace are? What would you be willing to sacrifice for temporary "peace"?
They probably know better than us. No?
The link is broken. Looks like code was accidentally pasted there.
https://lukasatkinson.de/2025/net-negative-cursor/%20%20%20%20let%20mut%20bytes%20=%20vec![0u8;%20len%20as%20usize];%20%20%20%20buf.read_exact(&mut%20bytes)?%3B++++++++%2F%2F+Sanitize+control+characters+++++let+sanitized_bytes%3A+Vec%3Cu8%3E+=+bytes.into_iter%28%29+++++++++.filter%28%7C&b%7C+b+%3E=+32+%7C%7C+b+%3D%3D+9+%7C%7C+b+%3D%3D+10+%7C%7C+b+%3D%3D+13%29+%2F%2F+Allow+space%2C+tab%2C+newline%2C+carriage+return++++.collect%28%29%3B
404 Page Not Found
The page you have requested does not exist. Would you like to visit the start page?
Cleaned up link: https://lukasatkinson.de/2025/net-negative-cursor/
Or "a novel published as authored by Lena McDonald contains AI prompt"
That 10 years ago.
Looks like they weren't able to borrow a 'was' for the sentence.
🤷 This didn't point out anything that's not a technical consequence and Microsoft planned for.
The overall ecosystem migration is not simple because of prevalence and variance in use, but it's still a huge net positive in my eyes.
I wouldn't call it messy. It's planned out, and the kind of process and concerns most senior devs are familiar with from any kind of tech migration. It's pretty clear with clear and well-defined concerns and solutions in my eyes.
I search with duckduckgo and the first results seem reasonable
Here's a signature and description https://www.khronos.org/opengl/wiki/Creating_an_OpenGL_Context_(WGL)#Create_Context_with_Attributes - khronos is publisher of OpenGL
here's the function I presume without attributes, so should be helpful to relate and compare https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/wingdi/nf-wingdi-wglcreatecontext
Case insensitive handling protects end-users from doing "bad" things and confusion.
I did not go through those phases.
How do you self-review while writing? What do you mean by that?
I see it as different phases of development, mindset, and focus. You inherently can't be in multiple at the same time.
It makes no sense to be thorough during experimental and iterative exploration. That'd be wasted effort.
After finding a solution, and writing it out, a self-review will make you take a systematic, verifying review mindset.
One of the two associations is in power and actively dismantling society. The other develops a technical product and runs a Lemmy instance many people and other instances have blocked.
Handling or concluding them a bit differently seems quite fine to me.
That being said, I've seen plenty of Lemmy dev connection criticism on this platform. I can't say the same about FUTO.