Now that you say so, I feel like I've read about this before. In comments about Diatraxis/one of them years ago. :)

I'm using the website / native website interface. It's at least possible there to edit the post and url. May be different for "Lemmy clients".

Are you sure you want sassc and not sass? I'm not familiar with the gem ecosystem, but there's sassc and sass as well.

Looking at the Web Archive; Diatraxis has been around since 2021. That divio docs since May of this year.

I doubt they didn't "get inspiration" from Diatraxis.

It's certainly something that looks better, but contrary to green washing, I see real, practical value.

I would rather be able to see and inspect source code than not. And I would rather have the right to take and fork a two year old version than not. Or be able to wait two years to fork the current version.

Those are real good value. Those bring certainty in infrastructure robustness and freedoms.

For me that's the wrong way around.

I want to be able to fix the issues I see. I hate it when I can't.

I'm thankful I am full stack and can do my stuff across borders. I hate the interfaces, waiting for stuff, or being hindered by dissatisfactory (to me anyway) stuff from them. So I'm glad when I have control over the entire stack - from talking to the customer to running production.

Anything I don't have control over - most if it doesn't get done, the rest can be okay or bothersome.

I hate that I don't see what the admin set up and does on the infrastructure. It makes it harder to assess issues and potential issues and how they could correlate with infrastructure changes and activities..

so you put up a front?

I feel like Jira is not enabling me to use Jira either.

I love her video. And when it suddenly goes into her comic, lol

be way too heavy to even take off

maybe the engines would take off by themselves

The article tells me more what features are new in Java 21 than it tells me anything about "keeping up with modern programming languages". I don't think the title fits.