man i wish there were some way to test that theory

maybe we could do sort of a 'stopping the ongoing genocide' test run, see how they respond

and then keep it going indefinitely because genocide is bad

i generally also drive past hospitals that dont deal with detached legs when my leg is detached

people constantly argue against their cause being right, because their cause is we need to work on fixing the problems as much as possible and governments are not doing that

that makes sense for a country where the few black folks that did live there were usually not exactly living it up

i dont see the problem with improving your credit score by sacrificing a virgin to the volcano every year, at least anyone can do it instead of just the well accepted white men

im being unfair of course, unlike modern credit scores tossing a virgin into the volcano doesnt still put minorities at a disadvantage

folks need to start causing real, material damage to fossil infrastructure at the least

this wont stop unless the expenses of fossil fuels outweigh the profits, and people need to become those expenses

do you have one for EU folks? want to donate, but donating to an actual trustworthy org is hard enough when there isnt this much misinformation

people criticised the bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima constantly, and continue to do so

europeans do not need uncle sams permission to send their own military hardware anywhere, they need uncle sams permission to send US patented and classified materials anywhere

similar to how the US needs permission to send [european country here]'s patented and classified materials anywhere

this is pretty interesting, but includes a lot of examples that either dont include a date of introduction or are from before the the national fascist party or even the existence of fascism as a concept

i dont feel like framing examples like that as fascist symbolism is fair or accurate, same as how organisations continuing their pre-nazism usage of the swastika isnt nazi symbolism

the most universal and common limits to free speech that people will come across on social media in the west are usually an iteration of 'don't be an asshole'

censorship is usually relatively lax on other fronts, and various sites will censor different things, whereas most every site will have basic enforcement of 'don't be an asshole' rules

as a result the most crying about free speech will come from folks who got told off for being an asshole and are entirely incapable of getting over it