He could have been a great guy, but instead chose violence and oppression while in office. Repeatedly.
How much must one repent to balance out spreading terror across the globe? No matter how committed he is to changing his legacy, he will never be able to take back the suffering he helped cause.
Scientists like to find significance in non-significant results when it fits their biases.
I see this all the time and it really sucks to have to repeatedly push back against it because you know those people were taught the importance of proving results are significant and are just ignoring the problem. It's usually from people in positions of power with financial conflicts of interest.
It's even worse when you say results from an animal study are insignificant, because they'll run another study that's bigger or somehow modified. Either way, more animals die.
I'm well aware of these instances and they were included in my link. I'm saying that these are not a good justification for their inaction.
If it's important to protect your citizens why not amend the rules? The Republicans have no issues with this tactic. The Democrats are toothless and complicit by not taking the necessary actions to properly represent their people.
Do you think their corporate sponsors accept these kinds of excuses?
Umm, I have it on pretty good authority that electric cars will solve the climate crisis and are immune to effects on the globe. Just do your part and buy an ~~$TSLA~~ ~~Tesla~~ EV.
No disadvantages? Idk, there is the whole disadvantage of .world being defederated from lemmygrad. :)
Doesn't matter how many siblings I've had, how many kids I've raised, or how long I've worked in environments where people talk rough.
Don't be a debate pervert. Go learn about mutual respect.
I feel like this trend was outlined in economic theories over 100 years ago.
At the risk of explaining the context of the comment you responded to where it may be unnecessary...
Lemmygrad is an explicitly Marxist instance of the Fediverse. A big part of Marxism is practicing dialectical materialism. Put simply, the purpose of practicing this is to look at the whole picture and the opposing forces at play in order to understand our world. What forces drive change and why do they drive change? How do we think these forces and changes will affect the world we live in and how can we actually make any meaningful difference in our world?
The user above is saying you won't get another answer here because when we look at how preorders for games operate, why companies offer preorders, and what benefits you get from preordering (why you would preorder a game), the logical conclusion is that not only is there (usually) no benefit for the consumer to preorder a digital game these days, but also that preordering a digital game actually hurts the consumer because it's encourages bad behavior from the company.
Hopefully that clears things up and I did a decent job greatly simplifying the concepts of dialectical materialism here. Many of us think that studying the world in this manner leads us as close to understanding the truth as possible and that we can use this logic to make the world a better version of itself. Ultimately, these concepts are at the heart of Marxism and it is Marxist theory that lays down the path for how to achieve communism.
All the other "ins and outs" you need to know about Lemmygrad: Come here and participate in discussions in good faith and you will be treated well even if we disagree with you. Come here and participate in discussions in bad faith and you will be ridiculed relentlessly.
Please, comrades, feel free to correct me here if I got something wrong.
Go read a book, chud.
Tell me you're a stupid chud without saying you're a stupid chud.
You don't have to care what I think if you read and make an informed decision on your own. As it is, I suspect you didn't bother to read the link?