I DM’d a group that tried to optimize every situation, and every turn off combat. That’s okay as long as it stays fun, but once they start spinning their wheels, or one player turns combat into a slog, then I take measures.

In my experience (and from what I've heard of other groups) optimisers are rarely the cause of this problem, usually it's the more casual or inexperienced players.

The ruling is vague enough that any specific cases can be decided based on the court's political preferences.

I love how this artist has two series; one with a different setup for the same punchline every time, and one with the same setup for a different punchline every time.

Do they mean a classic DnD foe, or a foe with the name of an entirely unrelated DnD monster tacked on?

Implying BDSM isn't some nerd shit

Why would Konsi play with such a handicap?

3. Secretly she wants to lose.

The disparity in the second group is funny. You have three that are around the power of high level spells, and then an epic level campaign BBEG's ultimate superweapon.

Konsi is only sensible financially.

Fixed

Not that it matters, since the Xanathar's subordinates will just replace Slygar.

Your comics are like 60% of the reason I check Lemmy.