Since I am bored with all the Yankee electoralism, here’s a general profile of Malaysian electoral parties
Most of these parties and coalitions also form larger coalitions and/or are splinters/mergers of each other.
I use “Malay-Muslim” to denote a racial-religious political identity unique to Malaysian and Singaporean politics. “Malay” has multiple meanings and various contestations throughout Nusantara (Maritime Southeast Asia).
“Racialism” is also used to highlight the particularities of how race plays out in Malaysia and Singapore, which is different (but interconnected) to how “Racism” plays out in the West and other colonized regions (Latin America and Africa). Malaysia and Singapore’s closest comparison will probably be East Africa as a result.
Barisan Nasional (aka The Tripartite Alliance or the OG compradors, racialism and anti-communism):
UMNO - Malay-Muslim feudal lords and now national bourgeoisie. Racialism with neoliberalism, original progenitors of “Ketuanan Melayu” (Malay-Muslim Supremacy/Dominance) which simmered down the past decade
MCA - Chinese bourgeoisie, had contacts with the KMT, Chinese racialism
MIC - Tamil and Hindu communalism, Indian racialism
KIMMA - Muslim Indian communalism, minor party
Perikatan Nasional (Malay-Muslim racialism):
PAS - Political Islam with racialised characteristics, used to be anti-colonial anti-neoliberal left, drifted more to big-tent for racialised rural Malay-Muslim politics with current leader
Bersatu - splinter because of perceived faults in UMNO, racialised “indigenous rights” (more akin to “nativist” in American context) with focus on “indigenous” Malay-Muslim politics, full membership exclusive to “indigenous” people
Gerakan - Global South Social Democracy
Pakatan Harapan (Capital L Liberalism, mostly urban base, allegedly “reformist”):
PKR - Social Liberalism
DAP - Western Social (Liberal) Democracy, key proponent of “Malaysian Malaysia”, a racialised liberal compromise
Amanah - Splinter faction of PAS, Political Islam with Social Liberalism
Others
GRS - coalition with many component parties, Racialism with regional characteristics
GPS - coalition with many component parties, Racialism with regional characteristics
MUDA - Global South Social Democracy, youth politics
Warisan - Social Liberalism, regional
Pejuang - Malay-Muslim Dominance/Supremacy “Ketuanan Melayu”
PSM and PRM - Marxism/Socialism
Hey folks! I will be busy for a long while and will probably be inactive on this site for the same period. I am starting my final year of university - very exciting times ahead.
As a result I’d like to leave a short primer about Malaysian and Singaporean politics on a highly contentious issue: race. Feel free to DM for further elaboration or sources regarding Malaysian/Singaporean politics. I am happy to oblige (whenever I have the time).
Alright, here it goes.
Class, race, culture, community, ethnicity and religion. All are jumbled up when talking about politics in Malaysia and Singapore.
How so? Firstly we have to take a civilisational approach: Chinese, Indian, Malay and Orang Asal (“Original People”) all have their own unique history of thousands of years, and within each there are defining characteristics that define their social structure.
What happens when this long overlapping cultural exchange in the Straits of Malacca gets disrupted by more recent and numerous immigration from South and East Asia under colonization?
This leads to stratification and polarization of the Malayan political economy (old name for Peninsular Malaysia that includes Singapore).
The Malayan Left had many arguments and debates on how to handle these fundamental cultural issues that have plagued the region for centuries. The debate is still ongoing.
However, there, perhaps 2 main strands can be identified:
1. Those that defines cultural autonomy as the primary contradiction.
2. Those that defines class and national liberation as the primary contradiction.
Many organisations can be labelled as one or the other but those within the same camp may not necessarily agree with each other with everything.
For an example, those that fall into
1. often fall into communal fights with other groups. An example of this would be the Chinese Literacy Movement that sought to maintain the existence of colonial era Chinese Language Schools, which more often than not, are also not under the purview of the colonial government (ie. in effect are private schools).
2. often underestimate the role of culture and race in the social reproduction of the Malayan economy. An example of this would be the MCP (Malayan Communist Party). In many of their party debates, it was often assumed that after national liberation was achieved, racial/cultural/communal issues would vanish. Unfortunately for us, we did not achieve true independence and the racialised political economy remains.
Prologue -
I can continue of course but I hope this short glimpse can help you understand why in my arguments I often involve terms such as “racialised”, “culture” or “chauvinism”. Because it is an essential part of understanding Malayan politics.
But understanding Malayan politics also requires some understanding of South, East and Southeast Asian politics. Under the global hegemony of US-led Capital, Eurocentrism and Orientalism pervades many thinkers, even in the Global South. There must be acknowledgment of this fundamental inequality of intellectual production which is overwhelmingly skewed to the West.
Only then you can finally understand and deal with the material realities of what we, the peoples of the Third World, have to face everyday.
~~See~~ Read you all later.