[-] Numberone@startrek.website 7 points 3 days ago

Oh. I hadn't considered this. Devastating....

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 28 points 3 months ago

Isn't the point of protest to not let people forget about things? How easy would it be in the west to not notice, the media certainly isn't keeping up on it. Every time I see one of these I think, that's a braver person than me, and thank fucking god for the Streisand effect. No downvote, but strong disagree.

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Stop it, stop it. I already like the guy. Geez. But really, great joke.

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 72 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Haha, yes only Russia and Iran are doing this. Good guys wouldn't behave like this...Israel definitely isn't doing the same thing to Gaza.. Was propaganda always this lazy or is this a new development?

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 58 points 7 months ago

The word rape doesn't show up in that entire article. Must be some kind of mistake. I wonder why that would happen?

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 41 points 8 months ago

And the US Immediatly stops weapons shipments....the US immediately stops weopons shipments....right?

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 33 points 8 months ago

Does anyone have a link to this actual speech, whenever I hear something this damning, I assume something is wildly out of context.

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 23 points 10 months ago

I'm just curious how many Palestinians need to die, and how much of Gaza needs to be razed to dust before we're "even" in the minds of proponents that somehow this war is justified. Legitimately and in good faith, when are we "good" here?

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 32 points 1 year ago

I mean when we watch decades of wars that kill thousands of American's and MILLIONS of people in their own countries for no reason, maybe we need a little additional justification rather than "fight for your country". Nah! Probably just the fault of the "instant gratification" generations being selfish again.

We see more, and trust less now. Seems like a good first order explanation to me anyway.

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 65 points 1 year ago

Whoopie doing this shit makes me more sad than other dipshit boomers. Growing up she was Guinan, a character on Star Trek TNG. She was unbelievably old and wise and gentle and kind and, honestly, had the best fucking hats. Every time she says something like this, or shat on Bernie, or whatever it is today, it drives home that it's all story telling, and makes it harder to believe in something better.

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I genuinely don't understand why so many people go with the network brand. AFAIK all of the US networks have MVNO's that operate on their networks at much lower cost. Some of those virtual operators are even owned by the big guys, e.g. Cricket on ATT. My coworkers pay literally hundreds of dollars more per month than is necessary, and what, they get a few Mbps faster data rates? Is that really worth it?

Edit: TIL a lot of people have had a hard time with MVNO's. My experience has been excellent and consistent, but that apparently doesn't generalize.

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 24 points 1 year ago

For me using signal wasn't about becoming Jason Bourne, it was about changing the threat model. I don't have any dilusions of grandeur that I can't be owned if I'm targeted, but you know what? My calls and texts aren't stored with my phone company with a direct link to the Government and advertisers. That may be low hanging fruit, but that's dealing with most of the issues the average user is going to run into. I'd suggust that the step from SMS to Signal is of greater benifit to a normal user than from signal to something more advanced. And, fwiw it's open sourced and audited, which gives me more confidence than something like imessage or WhatsApp, despite similarities im encryption schemes.

view more: next ›

Numberone

joined 1 year ago