You posted an outdated picture without explanation, and now you changed your own description of what point you're trying to make ("uniquely fertile ground" vs "uniquely far right"), and now you're trying to turn this around on me.

No, I don't see how an outdated picture that doesn't reflect the current reality proves or refutes anything.

For the record, again, I don't necessarily disagree with you, I don't think Germany has unique circumstances or w/e that make it especially vulnerable to far right ideology. I just think you're doing an awful job and bringing your point across.

And now I'll stop replying with multiple paragraphs to your one-line comments, obviously you're not putting much effort into them.

That may very well be, but I don't see how your link is relevant either.

What PR department?

Which European countries have a more progressive policy regarding cannabis?

Polls for AFD in Germany are currently about twice that.

"China verfolgt [...] eine hegemoniale Strategie." ist für dich keine Kritik an China? Für mich ist "hegemonial" eindeutig negativ konnotiert.

Indeed.

In that case, I fail to follow your explanation. What's more important: Words/sentiments, or actions? For example, Macron talks the talk, but fails to walk the walk, as evidenced by France's sub-par contributions.

In my opinion, the outcome is what matters. But also: Sign off the Tauruses, Olaf!

8k context is nothing.

Please don't

It's a good thing you don't make the rules, then!

And that intellectually honest discussion should start with you assuming what 1/3 of the population thinks, without any evidence to back it up?

Obviously. But Trump was president so he was in charge.