[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 84 points 4 weeks ago

Oof owie, my instance

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago

I don't want to accidentally cache some no-no content that gets me turbofucked by the law, sure I could probably defend if it ever came up but that's a stress i dont even want the possibility of having in my life

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 21 points 9 months ago

It would make me immensely happy for Nintendo to be labeled a vexatious litigant. It'll never happen, but let me dream damn it

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 21 points 9 months ago

you're surely aware that your situation is the exception rather than the rule

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

My immediate thought was to wonder if this would help give kids who get left in a car by mistake have more of a fighting chance

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

I loved the original fable as I was a kid so I didn't pay any attention to media as I had no means due to my internet access being limited. So I experienced the game for what it was, not missing what it was promised as, which i think I'm really thankful as I'll always think of that game fondly

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 30 points 11 months ago

I actually interpreted this as X as in X11 window system and was very confused for a bit

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

All my homies love mint, just because it's friendly doesn't mean it's bad!

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Adelaide killed big chunks of their public transport system to appease Holden, who fucked off anyway. Still salty.

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago

I thought I was going insane with the wrong video thing. I have premium but also an ad blocker because the entire internet is a cancerous cesspit without one, so I wonder if I get hit with anti ad blocking measures or I was just tripping?

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Since when has not having grounds stopped corporations from trying? Case in point, YouTube copyright striking

[-] Owljfien@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

When I used to use one it was due to sites limiting downloads to 200kb/s or similar. 32 parallel requests got that up to 6.4MB/s

view more: next ›

Owljfien

joined 1 year ago