I don't want to accidentally cache some no-no content that gets me turbofucked by the law, sure I could probably defend if it ever came up but that's a stress i dont even want the possibility of having in my life

It would make me immensely happy for Nintendo to be labeled a vexatious litigant. It'll never happen, but let me dream damn it

you're surely aware that your situation is the exception rather than the rule

My immediate thought was to wonder if this would help give kids who get left in a car by mistake have more of a fighting chance

I loved the original fable as I was a kid so I didn't pay any attention to media as I had no means due to my internet access being limited. So I experienced the game for what it was, not missing what it was promised as, which i think I'm really thankful as I'll always think of that game fondly

I actually interpreted this as X as in X11 window system and was very confused for a bit

All my homies love mint, just because it's friendly doesn't mean it's bad!

Started watching him repair boards back in the day, enjoyed him going after companies to start with, and it's just become exhausting now

Adelaide killed big chunks of their public transport system to appease Holden, who fucked off anyway. Still salty.

I thought I was going insane with the wrong video thing. I have premium but also an ad blocker because the entire internet is a cancerous cesspit without one, so I wonder if I get hit with anti ad blocking measures or I was just tripping?

Since when has not having grounds stopped corporations from trying? Case in point, YouTube copyright striking

When I used to use one it was due to sites limiting downloads to 200kb/s or similar. 32 parallel requests got that up to 6.4MB/s