[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 39 points 9 months ago

I think we found it. Something worse than pineapple on pizza.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 61 points 10 months ago

Due to its proprietary nature, finding software that can properly read those files can be tricky.

LibreOffice is the usual go-to for folks wanting an office suite, that respects privacy, and FOSS. It can read docx files, but it can mess up formatting. Still, for many it’s the preferred choice. It’s got the best reputation.

Now if formatting REALLY matters, take a look at OnlyOffice. It handles those MS formats so much better. It’s not a bad suite, but it’s hard to beat the good reputation Libreoffice has gained.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago

If anything, they’re worse.

  1. Brave is an advertising company, that blocks everyone, but them. Forcing over people and companies into their system.
  2. They’re heavily in the blockchain ecosystem, with their own worthless crypto.
  3. They take from open source projects (uBlock, Chromium, etc), but threaten legal action when someone forks them.
  4. They install bloat/spyware on your Windows system (later claimed it was a mistake).
  5. Brave, and its CEO is right-wing, lobbying against things like same-sex marriage.

I could go on.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago

Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago

any technical solution short of DRM is provably impractical and unworkable.

Don’t give them ideas.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago

Other than the FairPhone, which you already mentioned, nothing really matches all criteria.

I’d give a nod to the Pixel line, though. Google already offers 5 years of software updates, and the next line is rumoured to get 7. Plus Google allows Custom ROM support, which makes it a fan favourite in the privacy community. Granted it’s not as repairable as the FairPhone, and it’s not as eco-friendly, but it’s decent enough.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What she didn’t see is me whispering in her mothers ear “I run Arch, by the way”. Then giving her a quick wink.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 year ago

Lying about collecting that data, because they do (and I block it). Not lying, but backtracking on everything else.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, those little snowflakes. Poor things. Do they need to retreat to their safe space? What about a kiss on their boo-boos? Never mind those bad pro human rights, pro equality, pro EU people can’t hurt you.

4
submitted 1 year ago by Platform27@lemmy.ml to c/apple@lemmy.ml

Hi all. I was wondering how iOS handles Contacts images, when it comes to encryption. It would be simpler without ADP (Advanced Data Protection), but I have it enabled.

ADP end-to-end encrypts your images, but contacts still uses the legacy (less private) encryption methods. So what happens with the photo tied to the Contact? Is it encrypted, or not? I’d assume as it’s Contact data, it gets treated as part of everything else the Contact holds. I’d just like to know for certain, hence this post. Bonus points if you can provide a source.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 year ago

Sentimentality, images of long dead family members.

Monetarily, my Steam account.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago

I put it in the same boat as WhatsApp. Better than SMS, but I’ll be sticking to Signal.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 104 points 1 year ago

So soon we’ll need uBlock Origin FitGirl Edition?

view more: next ›

Platform27

joined 1 year ago