what do you meant with burnt? i thought its even easier than yunohost?

How people lived before the 1950, with only the coal?

Wood is fine since the beginning?

Its funny that OP asked for ugly persons and most make an ugly man out of this..

Like, is there no sich thing as ugly women?

Edit: I dont know what OPs prompt was but it seems that AI is biased here as well.

I dont know if the last update was any bigger update, but at least several updates before my engine was not changed.

Asking the right questions.

Not with a rod. But with a hairdryer.

Uk is falling behind being a 1st world country.

I think people will have/ or are having more important problems than climate change nowadays.

E.g. what to eat the next day.

Did you read the article?

I for sure didnt.

Thanks for highlighting that.

I was carried away by having the discussions at my university with my peers in mind.

Copying+pasting the output of chatGPT without ever looking at it, or even using a language tool to publish thoughts that were never in your head to begin with, is the actual concern

Nevertheless I dont understand why this is a concern.

The scientific standards existed decades if not already at least a century.

Those discussions are putting chatgpt in a bad light. However the fact that our scientific system was eroded and made a mockery of before the introduction of chatgpt is not highlighted.

There are still plagiarizations around and nobody cares. Mostly because of political sensitivity.

However science has failed to repel "bad actors" (intentional or unintentional) from the scene.

I dont know when. And why. But publisher have for sure something to do with it.

Thats another point. Fair enough.

But still I dont think that science will stall just because of chatgpt.

Journalism? Will for sure. But scientific publications have a systemic problem (like publisher-polism, pubscores etc) And outsourcing writing work to chargpt is - in my opinion - non of them.

I think of it as in another anology.

Compare a screwdriver with a power tool.

Does the convenient solution hinder you from building your house simply because you cant "feel" the strength of the wood while turning the screw in?

i doubt.

The things you mentioned are coming into play when people think of AI as a god mode. As a user you are solely responsible for how to use a tool. If the user overestimates the power of the tool or use it for the wrong things. Its the users fault.

The scientist is still a scientist. Which is the author of the paper. Not gpt because it writes filler text or puts the scientists thoughts into sentences.

The context is still at the scientists plate. If the scientist does a poorly job at reviewing the gpts output. Gpt cant be faulted.

some people really like to live dangerously.

they sure will. but as they are pretty new in the game we have few sears left.