In both my experiences, once the "main group" left, there were people more aligned towards.. non "allowed" "methods of liberation".

I can tell you went to neither. You say you can't talk online because it is too dangerous, but also won't go to the concentration of people angry for the same reasons to talk about it. Is your plan to be a lone wolf? Because one asshole with a good drone that wipes out even ideally, like, musk, bezos, zuck, trump, 5 supreme court justices, hegseth, vance, thiel, you still haven't solved it if you were a lone asshole with a lucky drone. The problem is more systemic. Continuing pressure is necessary. Groups. Organization, which begins somewhere.

Have you ever played nuclear throne? That's kinda my preferred pacing in a game, but there aren't many. I'd love a soulslike where combat was that fast and frantic, and bosses are really difficult but also die really fast if you play it right.

so I’m not sure I know what you mean.

I was mostly basing it on videos I've watched. I haven't actually played it. I'd kind of consider any fight that lasts more than 10 minutes to be well into bullet sponge territory though.

Having a stance meter instead of healthbars sounds pretty interesting though, I think I'll check it out.

What ecosystem collapses when removing a single creature? Are you talking about pre-holoscene extinction ecosystems? Or are you talking about modern ecosystems (after most of the original biodiversity has already been obliterated, and "removing one species" is actually thousands down on the list of removals)?

How bullet spongey are enemies? One of the reasons I have avoided eldenring is because it looks that every mob has a million HP.

Every time I try a newer Civ title, I end up just going back and doing a Civ IV playthough.

Also, I am pretty sure the games main fanbase is probably pretty.. critical of police, to put it mildly.

Beyond that, Zero Parades devs aren't the Disco Elysium devs anyway.

Only because they were still 1 year away from antimatter explosion vests

Someone who didn't touch a phone until 18 is going to be so susceptible to scams, catfishes, propaganda, digital manipulation, etc, that I definitely think it is a dangerous nuclear option. Controlled, monitored by good parents, layered introduction is definitely better in my opinion.

He has a shootable face. Fuck fascists. He isn't a political rival, or someone to be debated in the marketplace of ideas, he is my enemy, an existential threat who espouses every characteristic deplorable in humans, he is ideologically opposite of me in every way, and seeks to control or kill me and those like me, just like his child raping lunatic partner.

Ban me for speaking truth and I'll go somewhere else, heck, that's why I just came here from reddit.

The capitalist part that wants money can build an accurate enough profile with just statistical correlations, but the fascist aspect isn't doing it "for the children" or even just money, it's doing it to completely dismantle all digital privacy, so they can know what everyone is saying and doing online at all times.

I don't think there is any way to actually functionally verify age without either an ID check, or a check that ultimately traces back to an ID check from some entity further up the chain. Any successful age check will either dox your identity to the checker, or it can be trivially bypassed.