[-] Senal@programming.dev 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

IIRC licensing monopolies and capitalist bullshit.

old link but still : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26143407

[-] Senal@programming.dev 17 points 1 month ago

"This stops them from killing babies" and "This also predominantly affects the group I don't like" aren't mutually exclusive ideas

[-] Senal@programming.dev 25 points 2 months ago

TL;DR;

Posting a link to a bunch of other links you don't seem to have actually read isn't a good basis for an argument


Scientific evidence, sure, but if you'd actually read them you'd see they aren't as inline with your argument as you seem to think.

Do you mean the one behind a paywall

Perhaps the one consisting almost entirely of owner reported (and thus inherently bias) results

Maybe the meta-study that specifically calls out how little quality and volume there is in this areas of study, comments on how self-reported studies are bias and in conclusion basically says:

“It doesn’t seem to immediately kill your pets in the limited studies that have been done, we have even seen some benefits, but we don’t have enough quality data to be that confident about anything”

How about this one which is again largely based on self-reported results.

You should actually read the "Study Limitations" section for this one.

Or the last one which is about vegetarian diets, again goes out of it's way to specifically call out the lack of current research and that the majority of current research supporting these diets is "rarely conducted in accordance with the highest standards of evidence-based medicine"

I'm aware i'm cherry picking quotes and points here, but only to illustrate that these papers aren't the silver bullet you seem to think.

Not to say there is no validity to the argument that these diets can be beneficial but it's a far cry from vegan diets are scientifically proven safe for cats and dogs.

[-] Senal@programming.dev 27 points 2 months ago

cheery picking laws aside

That would imply there was "cherry" picking to be set aside.

cherry picking in this case would imply picking only the law(s) that supports the bias of the poster, to the exclusion of other laws that contradict this position.

I'd be interested in seeing the contradicting laws you think would make this cherry picking, do you have any links ?

[-] Senal@programming.dev 15 points 2 months ago

You don't need to suspect you can check for yourself, modlog exists.

[-] Senal@programming.dev 24 points 2 months ago

The subjectiveness of it being a superior product aside.

Brave is chromium under the hood and therefore contributes to the rendering engine homogeneity that leaves Google in control of web standards.

Iirc they are keeping some support for manifest v2 , for now. It'll be interesting to see how that plays out for them both financially and from a technical upkeep point of view.

I'd guess it doesn't last long, but haven't looked at it hard enough to have an informed opinion on it.

[-] Senal@programming.dev 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's also a logical fallacy.

You are conflating lack of effective choice with active support.

In an effectively two party race, where both arguably are supporting a position (through action if not through ideology) there is no option where you aren't effectively contributing to said position.

Vote either way or not at all , you are contributing to the overall success of one party or the other.

"Our genocide guy is better" is really the only option when there is no other practical choice.

Even voting independent just supports whoever happens to be winning from the two main parties.

What are you proposing is the practical option for people who don't want to be "in support of parties involved in committing genocide"?

To be clear i have no good answer to this either, just wondering if you do.

[-] Senal@programming.dev 59 points 3 months ago

"News outlet" might be the most generous interpretation I've ever seen.

[-] Senal@programming.dev 16 points 7 months ago

Brazil (1985)

5

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/12701628

Struggling with a problem that i just can't seem to figure out.

When starting from scratch self hosting both the SCM and CI/CD server.

Given that you can't use an existing setup to deploy/manage it, what is the best practice for deploying said services?

[-] Senal@programming.dev 28 points 8 months ago

To me this reads as:


< preemptive justification for saying something controversial and/or indefensible >

< controversial statement with no justification or reasoning >

"Not going to explain because it's obvious"


Probably not how it was intended, but that's some weak sauce

[-] Senal@programming.dev 28 points 9 months ago

I'm having trouble parsing this so i might be commenting on something that isn't there.

Current edge is a chrome re-skin with some addons, I'd put good money on it not being google free.

If you care about data going to nefarious places you probably shouldn't be using either.

[-] Senal@programming.dev 16 points 11 months ago

you mean the faces that are already posted by the FBI for everyone to see ?

view more: next ›

Senal

joined 1 year ago