58
submitted 3 months ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/degoogle@lemmy.ml
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

some choices mentioned are questionable (e.g. Brave and PIA), some good solutions are omitted (Organic Maps), but otherwise it's... surpringly not horrible.

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 31 points 2 months ago

it's... surpringly not horrible.

Except for the video thumbnail.

[-] MinusPi@pawb.social 8 points 2 months ago

He's said that he hates it just as much, but it's so effective that not doing it is just bad business.

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip -3 points 2 months ago

"I know I'm making an idiot of myself but this way I'm making more money"

[-] MinusPi@pawb.social 5 points 2 months ago

He runs a business. Many people's livelihoods rely on the performance of their videos.

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

Paint it however you like, it doesn't change the facts.

[-] MinusPi@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago

He makes a fool of himself for money. No one is disputing that. You seem to be painting that as a bad thing.

[-] eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 months ago

What's the issue with PIA? I've used it for quite a while and am quite happy with it.

The choice that surprised me was them recommending 1Password ($40/year) over Bitwarden ($10/year, solid free plan).

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago
[-] comradegreetingcard@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago
[-] accideath@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yea, but also PIA has been independently audited multiple times and their zero logs policy seems to hold up.

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 8 points 2 months ago

Basically any VPN YouTubers shill is not going to result in a net gain in privacy (depending on your threat model) because many of them sell your data themselves, eagerly log traffic and comply with warrants, etc. Also their server IPs are usually known and blocked from various services.

[-] shoki@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

yeah, I'm kinda mad that they omitted organic maps, in my experience it is the cleanest osm app available.

(it may not have the most features but it's easy to use and reliable)

[-] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Out of the loop; what is wrong with PIA?

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

the only horrible thing about this is how bad some of the alternatives are; somehow, it seems that google maps is the only one that will give you directions using public transit.

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

if I had to guess, it's probably somehow related to how everyone uses Google's standard for public transport feed. I just use a separate transit app that covers bajillion of different cities in my country and lets me buy tickets without using Google Pay.

Organic Maps is testing public transport navigation, by the way, but it's not available in released builds yet: https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/blob/master/docs/EXPERIMENTAL_PUBLIC_TRANSPORT_SUPPORT.md

[-] viking@infosec.pub 31 points 3 months ago

As long as you are still sourcing the content from youtube, you're not really de-googled.

[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 31 points 2 months ago

Baby steps.

1000030887

[-] halm@leminal.space 31 points 3 months ago

Sure, but with the critical mass of videos on Youtube, and the sheer impossibility of consensually mirroring them all on another platform, accessing YT videos with Invidious or Newpipe is at least safer than wading unprotected onto Google's platforms.

[-] Voyajer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The video is available on floatplane as well if you want to watch not on YouTube/invidious

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 3 months ago

And bilibili

[-] Pherenike@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah it's practically impossible to completely escape GAFAM unless we renounce 'digital life' or make a humongous effort or whatever. It's about reducing / minimizing the amount of shit they know about us, not being the coolest most degoogled guy in the room. I can't afford to quit my job just because they make me use Microsoft Authenticator. So yeah essentially it's better to use Newpipe than Youtube, what a great thing that some dude or dudette decided to develop it for free, Peertube? Even better, yay options, end of story.

[-] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 months ago

Please stop promoting this creep!

[-] perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

I don't know a lot about Linus. What makes him a creep?

[-] InputZero@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

His workplace has been accused of being a toxic workplace, including sexual harassment.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/linus-tech-tips-youtube-controversy-1.6940087

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

That, and he steals from companies that send him devices to review after he completely fucks up testing by doing it against all specs. Must be the one Canadian asshole that exists.

[-] someonesmall@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Well-kept secret: There are nice people and assholes anywhere.

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Lol, pretty sure you're absolutely right.

[-] Templa@beehaw.org 13 points 2 months ago

I am very confused. Wasn't Linus the one that said that if you watch YouTube videos from creators using adblockers is like pirating their content? I didn't watch the video because I can't stand LTT but I am genuinely confused. Did he change his mind?

[-] reimufumo@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

his reasoning is that anyone who cares enough to use an adblocker already is, and if it's impossible to prevent it it should at least be done properly

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think if was him he changes that a long time ago, they also have a video about pi-hole.

Edit: Is him yes, he says that in the video around the 14 minute mark.

he promoted ublock and 2 others

[-] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago

LTT is the worst channel for privacy. I do like the channel for new tech and all but not for digital privacy.

[-] doodledup@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You can remove the ?feature= part https://youtu.be/GsjHMzGl-VY

It's for google to track how the people clicking the link got there. E.g. in this case you clicked the "share" button in the YT app

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 months ago
[-] doodledup@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Doesn't even mention Firefox.

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago

I wonder if the title implies that there are some other videos in the series, perhaps with a number lower than 2?

[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

This is part two. Browsers were discussed in part one.

[-] Pherenike@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 months ago

What a fucking joke.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
58 points (76.4% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

7743 readers
2 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS