When you accidentally grab a blank slide and panic for a little bit.

I realized that later, yeah. That's not something that a kid would usually realize is bad on their own, though; if it's something you and everyone you know has always done, most people wouldn't think to question it.

The corporate news media doesn't exist to put the good of the country and public service first, it exists to make money, and it's making a lot of money; they're not about to fix what isn't broken just because the country - and the world as a whole - is falling apart.

No, I mean literally get the people on board with the idea of having a second American revolution. With guns and everything.

You don't come to this conclusion if you're the kind of person to trust legitimate sources of information.

What idiots. If you're gonna pass Dunkin donuts off as your own, don't get the ones with the logo on them...

I highly doubt that OpenAI or any other AI developer would see any real repercussions, even if they had a security hole that someone managed to exploit to cause harm. Companies exist to make money, and OpenAI is no exception; if it's more profitable to release a dangerous product than a safe one, and they won't get in trouble for it, they'll likely have no issues with releasing their product with security holes.

Unfortunately, the question can't be "should we be charging them for this?" Nobody is going to force them to pay, and they have no reason to do it on their own. Barring an entire cultural revolution, the question instead must be "should we do it anyway to prevent this from being used in harmful ways?" And the answer is yes. Our society is designed to maximize profits, usually for people who already have money, so if you're working within the confines of that society, you need to factor that into your reasoning.

Companies have long since decided that ethics is nothing more than a burden getting in the way of their profits, and you'll have a hard time going against the will of the companies in a capitalist country.

Well, Bleem went down under the weight of Sony's lawsuits, just like Yuzu did with Nintendo's. Sony didn't even win any of their lawsuites against Bleem in the end, but constant legal trouble is usually too much for small startups to handle. The US's legal system essentially allows any company to duel any other, with legal funds as the weapon of choice, and the bigger weapon wins every time. Legality doesn't matter unless both companies can truly afford to fight the battle to the end, and emulators will likely never have that power. So all we can do as consumers looking for options is to try not to talk about the little guys so much that one of the big guys feels it's necessary to bury them to death with lawsuits.

Except lobbying isn't experts giving an opinion, it's rich people giving money. The only expertise the lobbyists ever have is knowledge on how to make money, since in order to get enough of it to lobby, you need to devote your life to it. The people who have enough expertise to legitimately advise the government on science don't make anywhere near enough to lobby.

Because it's a hell of a lot easier to hold poor people liable for other people's bullshit than it is to hold rich people liable for not honoring fraud reports. One can afford a lawyer, and knows the other can't.

Yeah, they're pretty behind the times, and I'm happy for that. They gave me a work laptop, but since they didn't block me from just using my home computer instead, I just do that so that I've got an excuse if they ever bring up any strange data they might be skimming from the laptop. It's been a couple years now without any word from them about it, though, so I think I'm in the clear.

It's always the guys the conspiracy theorists love most that do the shadiest shit.