[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 85 points 9 months ago

Even with good old wine, the friend is still not wrong

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 32 points 11 months ago

My chips are also on them coming back, but at the same time it feels like Musk wants to make Twitter's business harder than it needs to be.

This reaction doesn't come from the last tweet itself, instead it comes from him not stopping with hot takes and not showing any signs of slowing down.

If he keeps going, I could see companies just accepting "it is what it is" and coming back, but at the same time it also feels like he's one tweet away from going too far for most companies. And it's not like Twitter is a strong social media anyway, they are not even in the top 10 social medias in terms of active users count: https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/

Maybe these companies may also decide that dealing with Twitter is more trouble than it's worth. But we'll see

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 21 points 11 months ago

But I want to defend my -ism

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 61 points 11 months ago

This is a trick question, the real answer is that there weren’t real communist countries

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

The rest, enslaved

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

the symbol was making me think it was a cryptocurrency

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 62 points 1 year ago

Yeah being unable to open… checks notes local news websites from the US has been a real deal breaker

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 342 points 1 year ago

Can't tell if this is a shitpost or not

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Google: "How cute, anyway as I was saying..."

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately they are, if enough justification exists. In WW2, both the Allies and Axis would bombard cities with civilians if those had any strategic value (military industries, disruption of logistics, sometimes because soldiers were inside the houses, etc).

Other times, it was to try out hypothesis. Germany started to bombard London to see if the population would become demoralised and demand the government to capitulate. The US sent the infamous Hiroshima and Nagasaki Nuclear Bombs, because they believed the japanese military would not capitulate through conventional means (I recommend reading more about the pacific war if you're interested, but the bottom line here is that most japanese soldiers were expected to fight to the death, and the US could not treat them like a western power. The nuclear bombs were a bet that they could avoid having to invade Japan itself)

And to be honest things didn't change that much since then. There might be more awareness of how awful it is, some countries might need better justifications than others before targeting cities, but they do it. The US did it in the middle east, Russia too, etc.

From my average joe point of view, this attack didn't target anything with strategic value, but the attack itself is a message that Ukraine can reach Moscow.

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 73 points 1 year ago

Weird drama over nothing tbh

Communities are free to federate with whoever they want;

Consenting adults can do whatever they want.

Now give me a medal

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

Communism entails the collective ownership and administration of all means of production and the absence of social classes, while socialism advocates for worker control over means of production within a democratic society, allowing for some individual ownership and social stratification.

view more: next ›

SloganLessons

joined 1 year ago