Okay, this comment gave me a chuckle:

Thank god you have the archived version just in case they change it!

I need to know who the 159 are 😩

Wait, is Texas pulling a Quebec?

I get that but Russia setting off a nuke in a “harmless” area could be considered a first strike and therefore give a “reason” for NATO to start bombarding them with their own. I don’t know if it’s worth it. I genuinely see this strike as a provocation for Russia to send a nuclear bomb just so the west can justify finally sending their own.

Maybe they just want Ukraine to collapse so Russia looks even worse. Of course, Russia’s reputation on the international stage is doing pretty well (especially in the eyes of the global south) and I can’t see a total Ukraine defeat shattering their image, but I don’t know if the west really knows that. Maybe if they can paint Russia as this truly evil and dominating force (look how they pummelled poor baby Ukraine) it will encourage mainly European and western citizens (US, Canada, Australia) to take up arms or something. Does any of what I’m saying make sense? It’s complete speculation on my end, a complete opinion and borderline conspiracy. That’s just where my head is at right now as I don’t understand the motivation in continuing this battle.

Vijay Prashad remains correct. I don’t want to stay here anymore 😫

Wait, those stamps actually effect travel? I thought they were like cute little “hey, you made it!” markers. Like a collection or something, I didn’t think you’d be penalized for having a stamp from a “bad” country…

Civil War 2: Electric Boogaloo?

He supported that?!

Whomp whomp

True, I hate NAFO so much. The fact that real life politicians and political figures are encouraging and even joining it is so embarrassing.