You're doing this on the day Haveno has 2 competing markets launch?
Actually, Bitcoin is sold by regulated entities with KYC laws & approved by the SEC.
Monero is AnCap.
I got busy and stopped shit talking, and shilling my website for a week, and you guys got bored
I'm asking you to consider this technology beyond just evasion. It's a distribution system for content.
Matrix is tied to one server. Federation is physical locations. Yeah you can hide those locations with Tor or I2P, but ultimately if that location is found its game over. With a blockchain based and node based system, its full blown crypto anarchy. You can establish a reputation that can't be taken away.
The same way we value XMR for it's self-custody of money, as opposed to btc lightning that ties it to a liquidity server. That same logic, is now why self-custody of communication is greater than "federated liquidity hiding"
The metadata of conversations is just as important as the metadata of money. The CIA director said "we kill people off metadata"
Also this conversation was about censorship, not just pure privacy. Matrix is federated, just like SimpleX. Meaning it uses government domains. So one could not trade Monero on either of these platforms against the will of sanctions with any meaningful size.
Can you do a small amount and different burners? Sure. But then how's the customer gonna verify its you and find you? PGP signatures over Matrix DMS? c'mon man, we're talking about freedom here.
I'd recommend Bunny, they accept anonymous Bitcoin, and maybe we can pitch to them to start with Monero if they'll take us on as customers. Also if the person is willing to pay the EU VAT tax, then you get GDPR for customer data.
I'd recommend Bunny, they accept anonymous Bitcoin, and maybe we can pitch to them to start with Monero if they'll take us on as customers. Also if the person is willing to pay the EU VAT tax, then you get GDPR for customer data.
updated https://simplifiedprivacy.com/banbitcoin/
Quotes from the New York Times:
“Shlomo Brom, a retired general and former deputy to Israel’s national security adviser, said an empowered Hamas helped Mr. Netanyahu avoid negotiating over a Palestinian state.” [5]
As long as Hamas was in-charge of the Gaza Strip, Israel could say at the UN “look we have no partner for peace”. Then they’d avoid having to make land successions. The New York Times continues:
“Mr. Lieberman: “For Netanyahu, there is only one thing that is really important: to be in power at any cost,” he said. “To stay in power, he preferred to pay for tranquility.” Suitcases filled with cash soon began crossing the border into Gaza” [5]
The money flowed from Israel to Qatar to Hamas. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz covered this extensively: [11]
Military Intelligence Director Amos Yadlin commented on June 13, 2007 that “Israel would be happy if Hamas took over Gaza because the IDF could then deal with Gaza as a hostile state.” [11]
Then a different Haaretz article covering the Jerusalem Post’s coverage: [10]
According to the Jerusalem Post, in a private meeting with members of his Likud party on March 11, 2019, Netanyahu explained the reckless step as follows: The money transfer is part of the strategy to divide the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. [10] [8]
And further brought to our attention by Scott Horton [8]:
“In an interview with the Ynet news website on May 5, 2019, Netanyahu associate Gershon Hacohen, a major general in reserves, said, “We need to tell the truth. Netanyahu’s strategy is to prevent the option of two states, so he is turning Hamas into his closest partner. Openly Hamas is an enemy. Covertly, it’s an ally.” [10] [8]
And this same money was what enabled the terrorism attacks on Oct 7th and NOT Bitcoin as Elizabeth Warren will have you believe. As the New York Times confirms:
“Israeli intelligence officials now believe that the money had a role in the success of the Oct. 7 attacks, if only because the donations allowed Hamas to divert some of its own budget toward military operations.” [5]
These are only a few of the hundreds of quotes from Israeli newspapers and Israeli officials. Please see Scott Horton’s excellent write-up for even further information. [8] The amount of evidence is overwhelming including first hand quotes from Netanyahu himself. [12]
Sources: https://simplifiedprivacy.com/sourceswarrenbitcoin/
Yes I'm a Libertarian and I agree with you philosophically. This was meant in terms of prediction of government propaganda so citizens can properly prepare for their own personal situation
The main difference between the register article and this one is the register is optimistic that Google will stop. While as the comments in this chat clearly indicate alternative views.
I disagree. There are a variety of ways your data can be leaked. For example, the person you're talking to can be using a Google stock phone or Microsoft windows which may collect data. If this was a random XMPP name, this would provide more protection than your real phone number. Furthermore, there are academic studies proving the metadata can be gotten. Please see this for more information: https://simplifiedprivacy.com/signal-messenger-guide-to-avoid-privacy-mistakes/
great job, thank you