It's so interesting how the most condescending people always see facts as condescending. It really just is the case that you can be wrong. As you get older and learn to not mindlessly repeat headlines you will see just how absurd you used to be.

I'm just willing to look at history beyond some arbitrary point to try to win an argument. You are absolutely correct, if you ignore the parts of the past that don't agree with your pre-conceived notions, then you are right. Unfortunately for you, history doesn't care about where you choose to make arbitrary lines.

Believe it or not, it can be and is used as both. If you have any other questions or things you think won't work, just ask! A lot has happened in the last 5 years, and most issues people have with Bitcoin have been long ago solved. It is incredible how much different things are now, lots of old issues(like dealing with 0.0000015 issues) are no longer a problem.

There isn't a government run currency on the planet that has come anywhere remotely close to performing as good as bitcoin in the last decade. Give me something that goes up in value over something that only "slowly" falls in value like the EU or USD.

I use ai when I use search engines. This makes the search engines better. I also use ai when I get spotify suggestions. I use ai when I use autocorrect. I use ai without even realizing I'm using ai and the ai improves from it, and I and many other people get an improved quality of life from it, that's why nearly everyone uses it just like I do.

So, @givesomefucks , do you also regularly use ai that improves from from your usage? Or are you not a hypocrite who thinks there is something morally bad about specific ais that you don't like while doing exactly what you claim to be against with other ais? How are your moral lines drawn?

Hypothetical. Look it up. It is commonly used in discussions. Don't let new words scare you.

Yeah, commenting on someone's comment they made about my comment isn't personal. It's interesting how you know you dislike what I said but can't come up with anything to actually say about it. Maybe you should take that as an indication that you don't actually know why you parrot the things you do.

You are absolutely right. Brazil is not banning the internet. Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

Also, if the only way you can feel like you are "winning" a discussion is by changing what other people say, then you simply are not winning at all. You are writing fan fiction about yourself to try to feel clever. It backfired.

It is really great that you can make stuff up. Hypothetical questions have been useful for as long as people have discussed things. I'm sorry that this hypothetical question offended you so much, but it is entirely different than "making stuff up".

Would you support Brazil if their government ordered a complete internet ban?

Wait till you hear what happens on the factory farms that nearly everyone's meat and dairy comes from. Animals would be lining up for a chance to be treated as well as this dolphin that died at the hands of this bastard.

Yes, it is literally impossible for any AI to ever exist that can be creative. At no point in the future will it ever create anything creative, that is something only human beings can do. Anybody that doesn't understand this is simply incapable of using logic and they have no right to contribute to the conversation at all. This has all already been decided by people who understand things really well and anyone who objects is obviously stupid.