[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Care to explain how?

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

All one really needs to know is that there's nothing legislated here, these are merely "guidelines" for the banking industry, i.e. essentially nothing.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Puddle-deep "analyses" such as yours is tiring as well.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I'd consider it more likely you need medication and some time offline but hey you do you, friend.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Outside of the cynical bluster of all your comments in this post, you've certainly convinced me of that assumption.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I mean, I'm more familiar with the 30 years of evolving values since the show aired.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

That NDP party leadership isn't already planning a campaign with cost of living issues as the focus unfortunately sums up today's NDP: looking for headlines instead of votes.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Perhaps your question would be better posed to the BBC.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

This is likely the vapidest thing I'll see all week. Conspiratorial garbage.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Written like a true sociopath.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Do you have any links to perhaps back up that assertion? I have my doubts that it's always been as high as 50%.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Anyone saying they'd vote Liberal instead of any other parry likely isn't a renter. Or you know, you could recognize that different people have different reasons for voting. Agree on your point about the NDP tho, that they're not making hay in the current socioeconomic context is pretty damning on party leadership.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

alabasterhotdog

joined 1 year ago