All one really needs to know is that there's nothing legislated here, these are merely "guidelines" for the banking industry, i.e. essentially nothing.
Puddle-deep "analyses" such as yours is tiring as well.
Honestly, I'd consider it more likely you need medication and some time offline but hey you do you, friend.
Outside of the cynical bluster of all your comments in this post, you've certainly convinced me of that assumption.
I mean, I'm more familiar with the 30 years of evolving values since the show aired.
That NDP party leadership isn't already planning a campaign with cost of living issues as the focus unfortunately sums up today's NDP: looking for headlines instead of votes.
Perhaps your question would be better posed to the BBC.
This is likely the vapidest thing I'll see all week. Conspiratorial garbage.
Written like a true sociopath.
Do you have any links to perhaps back up that assertion? I have my doubts that it's always been as high as 50%.
Anyone saying they'd vote Liberal instead of any other parry likely isn't a renter. Or you know, you could recognize that different people have different reasons for voting. Agree on your point about the NDP tho, that they're not making hay in the current socioeconomic context is pretty damning on party leadership.
Care to explain how?