What hole. They were never colonized.

Everyone knew that brexit means leaving the single market. The entire point of Brexit was to 'take back control'. People voted for this Brexit in 2019. They made their bed, now they can lie in it.

Brexit means Brexit, not breakfast in Paris.

There is nothing unfortunate about being able to buy products that are both cheap and high quality.

So you know how annoying it is when someone tells you they know your gender better than you. That you are wrong about your gender and should do therapy to be the gender they think you should be? Oh, you do? Then please stop doing it. Thanks.

Now that Google spilled the beans WilliamTheWicked can no longer extract contact information of females from the ChatGPT training data.

The problem that I see is that you aren’t very present in the art.

Now that depends on how much agency you give yourself, doesn't it? If you just give Midjourney a prompt and call it a day then yes. But the result won't be very good, will it? Similar how you could just input random notes to a synthesizer and get shitty music in return.

The problem is that the majority of people does exactly that and then shares the resulting images online, making it appear that is all there is to it. You can however express yourself artistically by using prompt engineering to get something good and than working with that to further approach what you imagine by editing the result. There are many people out there who could not artistically express themselves as they lacked the ability to translate their vision to a canvas. With the help of image generating AI they can finally express themselves. I think this is something beautiful.

How are we going to develope [sic] new styles?

While I do agree with you that our current AI image generators won't be very innovative, this is by design and not necessity.

This is what you would have gotten in let's say 2017 when asking an AI what it thinks a dog looks like (s. DeepDream).

And a couple years later you can achieve this with Midjourney.

Things are developing very fast and in the end of the day, even if we would never get an AI that can innovate art there is nothing stopping humans from just doing it themselves as we have always done over millennia. You can already greatly increase the creativity of existing image generators by tweaking the randomness factors and those algorithms don't just remix existing images, they are actually creating their own. You need the training set of existing labeled images to train the AI as it doesn't know what a frog is, nor a tree or anything really.

AI is just going to continue to remix remixes of remixes

This is indeed a concern. If you feed too much AI generated images into the training of an image generator it causes a sort of degenerative disease in the AI that results in inferior results. Some sort of AI incest so to speak. The prevalence of AI art on the internet and the inability to reliably differentiate it from human art is proving to be a challenge for making new training sets.

This was weeks ago and iirc referred to getting the blood of lathander without having to steal it.

Most of that number comes from some visual glitches or other minor stuff you might not even notice if you encounter it.

You can read through the entire list and it's mostly stuff like "fixed random skeleton dropping unspoiled food instead of rotten food"

They can revoke the license whenever, but you can sue them for it. Whatever illegal garbage is written in the EULA won't hold up in court.