Ninety-one felony indictments in four cases in three states and Washington, DC. And forty of them are either for or are related to espionage.
Wow.
either way?
look, the headline makes it sound like the SG of NATO made ceding land conditional to join NATO, which simply didn’t happen. What seems like did happen is that he merely suggested it as a possibility during a panel discussion, and not even to Ukrainians.
One is an outrageous diplomatic blunder of international proportions, the other is a somewhat insensitive gaffe and nothing more. It’s huge difference, and it’s important not only to note that but how shitty it is of Newsweek to make it sound like the first happened when, in reality, it was the second. as I pointed out, the first 3 sentences is backtracking from the total lie of a headline.
Ok, so here’s the headline:
NATO Official Gives Ukraine 'Unacceptable' Conditions for Joining
Then the first sentence:
The chief of staff for NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has angered Kyiv officials for suggesting Ukraine could become a member of NATO if it ceded some of its territory to Russia.
Then the second sentence.
Stian Jenssen, who has held the title of director of the Private Office of the NATO Secretary General since 2017, reportedly made the suggestion while speaking on a recent panel in the Norwegian city of Arendal.
Now we have 3 slightly different versions of the story, but the differences are very important. Which one is the truth? The headline says he gave conditions to Ukraine, the second implies it, and the third clarifies that he was speaking to a Norwegian discussion panel. In Norway, where there may not have even been an Ukrainians present.
WTF, Newsweek?
weird how those who keep claiming “protect the kids!” really just want to control everything you do and spy on you. and then they keep getting busted for things like pedophelia, child molestation, chid sex trafficking, and possessing child porn?
weird, huh?
Equality means you get to be exploited like the rest of the peasants 
his biggest donor just cut him off for being “a bit much” with the nazi shit, so don’t be so sure he’s paying audience members.
[sad nazi trombone]
why? do you need to see the individual sperm in the cum? do you want to be able to count the pubic hairs? why on earth would someone want that level of detail in porn?
I don’t get it
edit: sorry, I didn’t mean for this to come off as rude as it did!
there’s this:
its free, and it’s licensed under the MIT license. it’s a bit bare-bones, but it works!
bauhaus
joined 1 year ago
Nobody is shrugging this off. Those left of center are freaking out while the Nazis on the right are cheering him on.
Nobody is shrugging this off