I always come back to Smart Launcher. I grew up with category-based application menus on on PC, I can't stand having a giant unorganized app drawer. It's so cluttered and messy. I'm always surprised at how little mention it gets and instead everybody talks about these "minimalist" launchers that are literally just unorganized app drawers.

Criticizing people's past and current actions relating to the subject and bringing up their direct history relavent to the subject is not a personal attack, nor is it out of line to point out he does his to advance his political agenda within the project, which is why he got banned in the first place. All of this directly relates to the subject at hand.

You know what doesn't relate to the subject at hand? Your random little "sjw gender terrorists" comment. But it does make it rather clear why you want to obfuscate the facts about Srid's history with the project, subsequent ban, and continued amplification of drama and general shit-stirring ever since.

Man if buying the future was that cheap and easy it would make for a good fixer-upper project

If you actually believed this, you wouldn't work. You don't really believe it, though.

Yep.

Making of a big deal about it is what takes away effort from meaningful action. Nobody is taking time out of their day over this issue but you. This is silly.

Unfortunately it is.

You can absolutely attach each VM and even the host to separate NICs which each connect back to the switch and has its own VLAN. You can also attach everything to one NIC and just use a virtual bridge(s) on the host to connect everything. Or any combination therein. You have complete freedom on how you want to do it to suit your needs. How this is done depends on what you're using on the host for a hypervisor though, so I can't give you exact directions.

One thing I should have thought of before; if two NICs are on one single PCI card, you probably can't pass them through to the VM independent of one another. So that would limit you to doing virtual networking if you want to split them.

Having tried both, I found it far easier and less troublesome to just add a PCI passthrough than it is to worry about managing the network both on the host and in the VM. As long as FreeBSD supports the driver, I strongly recommend passthrough vs virtualized NICs.

Sorry, to be clear, they're not Bluetooth. I've got a set of Meze 99 Neos. I've got my desktop, laptop, phone, and Steam Deck that I use them on regularly. I've had Bluetooth headphones in the past and I've never had one that can pair to 4 things, not to mention trying to get it to connect to the right one when more than one has power is annoying.

These ones are also sturdy, easy to repair, and use a standard 2.5mm to 3.5mm connection. There's no battery to wear out and no electronics of any kind to fail. So long as I don't physically break them, I expect them to keep working for many years to come. There's no wireless headphones I'm aware of and certainly no wireless earbuds that I can say that about. I have no interest in buying devices designed to be consumed and discarded past a certain date.

I use my headphones on multiple devices. Pairing them every time I want to switch is a pain in the ass. Also, my current headphones are still good and will hopefully last for a very long time, as I specifically went after headphones that are study, easy to maintain, and repair. So I have no need for Bluetooth headphones, and I have no desire for Bluetooth headphones. I just want a jack to plug in.

Defederation doesn't prevent that from happening at all. They don't need us to do that, and I'm sure they'll absolutely be doing stuff like that. It just doesn't affect our servers in any way.

The idea that they can lure in people currently on the Fediverse just doesn't seem realistic to me. Look at how many people have had an immediate reaction to completely block them; you think this is fertile ground for recruitment, really?