[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

From the linked Andrew Molitor item:

Why Extropic insists on talking about thermodynamics at all is a mystery, especially since “thermodynamic computing” is an established term that means something quite different from what Extropic is trying to do. This is one of several red flags.

I have a feeling this is related to wanking about physics in the e/acc holy gospels. They invoke thermodynamics the way that people trying to sell you healing crystals for your chakras invoke quantum mechanics.

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They want sneers about Yud's lack of qualifications? Fine:

Noncy prig who never went to high school founded a cult for people who can't leave it behind! How's about that, eh?

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 11 months ago

Some of the most obnoxious moments here are when someone dredges up a historical feud and the peanut gallery thinks it’s productive to opine at length on the object level of that feud.

zoom and enhance

object level

pull back, split screen

While I am not personally a rationalist,

Uh-huh.

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 11 months ago

"Gerard was the age I am now in 1995 when I was born. Alice is twice my age and stands 4 metres to the left of Gerard. She is half the height of Imhotep..."

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 11 months ago
[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 11 months ago

"Humans are generally far removed from the scene of battle" (if you don't count the people that the drones are blowing up)

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 1 year ago

Bio people here are poorly informed. Just in general some of the presentations are factually incorrect

B-but rationalists are experts at covalent bonds

Also meeting people.... as a woman I have never felt as ignored and disrespected as I have in some instances the pa...

I'm sure the feedback becomes more positive in the cut-off part, no doubt about it

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 19 points 1 year ago

Why did 3.6 million people watch this hour long video dunking on flat earthers? Because the topic of people believing crazy things is fun and interesting.

Dan Olson's In Search of a Flat Earth is most definitely not just an hour of dunking on flat-Earthers.

It pivots to discussing QAnon at 37:30.

From the comments:

This just went from 0 to 100 real quick.

Lord, the cry of pure anguish I gave out in response to that line...

Props to the Qanon guy's kid for standing up to him and saying "nobody's gonna help you" when he kidnapped them, that must have been terrifying

Occasionally rewatch this while dealing with the loss of my own parents to conspiracy lunacy. Even tried using this video to pull them back from the edge. Ended up precipitating cutting contact with them, something that has done wonders for my mental health. I have since realised they were deeper in than I thought, and were never going to listen to their child, and unlikely to listen to people they actually might have respected the opinions of.

The person I used to consider my father now believes that viruses aren't real and is getting deep into transphobia and Putin worship. He is likely to already be a holocaust denier. There is no bottom to the conspiracy theory abyss and few ever seem to find their way back from the depths.

Thank you for crushing that last bit of remaining hope I didn't even know I had.

It's honestly kind of chilling to see him effectively spending half an hour predicting the Jan 6th riot.

"Fun and interesting"?

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 1 year ago

"Without resorting to sore losing, I'm going to be a sore loser. Nyah!"

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 1 year ago

As a physicist with a background in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics before moving to quantum information theory, let me reassure you that I speak from training and decades of experience when I say, "No, you dork ass loser."

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 19 points 1 year ago

In 2002, psychologist Richard Lynn and political scientist Tatu Vanhanen published their seminal book

Ah, "seminal" in the sense of "cum-bucket"

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 2 years ago

These guys use "entropy" the way that people trying to sell you healing crystals use "quantum".

view more: ‹ prev next ›

blakestacey

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF