[-] bluejay@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

LMAO you just get cuter and cuter don't you lil guy

[-] bluejay@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

I'm sure you have buddy. Keep telling yourself that.

[-] bluejay@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

I agree. Would help if the party didn't accept corporate money, like the Sander campaign before the DNC fucked him over.

[-] bluejay@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Removing yourself from the nation? So your idea is to just remove what blue voters are left? Also do you have sources to back up your claims about economic power? California is a massive powerhouse but many other blue states just aren't. Like Oregon.

[-] bluejay@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

Cool bro what a sound plan. I bet you feel important. If you want to actually try and implement change you need to either organize with a plan, leadership and support. Or you need to link up with orgs that exist. This kind of keyboard warrior justice is unbelievably irritating to see.

[-] bluejay@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's probably prudent for me to mention a few things, one I don't personally think that's where this is going, at least not yet. Two I'm aware of the sheer size and number of Americans would need to whole heartedly participate. I'd never expect that many to even get off the couch. I was more directing the sentiment of "resistance" that so many keyboard jockey liberals keep throwing around. I would not start or attempt to lead or even advocate for this level of action so prematurely. What I failed to articulate was I was operating under the assumption america had a civil war at the same scale of our first, or like other countries have had.

To your point, tangentially, if it were left v Trump 'regime', they'd (Trump regime) probably have support from Russia at the very least. We already know how limp dick NATO is. It would be a blood bath with a pinhole path to victory.

Do I believe it could happen or work with the current state of our country? No. Do I think we'll get there? No. Do I want it to? Still no. My point was if the left want it they should put their money where their mouth is and that it's not impossible for a well organized civilian army to "win" to some effect. Especially since something like that is bound to cause some splintering in the military.

[-] bluejay@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

This is why the people who scream "resist" don't. They/you always operate under the assumption it's just a guy and a group of crazy people.

[-] bluejay@lemm.ee -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Na you're right better to just roll over and die. The war in the middle east we won decisively without question because bombs. Same with Vietnam.

American military relies on three things. American people who want to fight, logistic networks and symmetrical warfare. Take away one of the legs like in the middle east and the us military becomes useless.

Try again.

[-] bluejay@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

You were right. I found the trending sub channel and found a swathe of content.

[-] bluejay@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Tried both. I get marginally more content via new. A lot of it is what's in hot but in a different order. I'm on boost for lemme if that matters.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

bluejay

joined 1 week ago