I'm sure this is an effort, in part at least, to drive a wedge between the democracies targeted by this administration. Don't lose sight of who our enemies are. Viva Mexico! Death to America!
Sorry for messing around with this post. Lemmy.world has a weird bug(?) where posts with CBC articles won't federate. Had to trick it.
That $1.3B wasn't demanded or promised today. They did it preemptively in mid-December to avoid this whole situation.
They committed $200M and bunch of drug/border theatre today. Basically just allowing Trump to save face for caving.
The guy tried to kill five people. What's the appropriate sentence for murder for hire?
Seems a bit of a stretch that that was her intention.
Having read them both, the Post does put a lot of focus on former colleagues, though I think they come across as having an agenda more than legit criticism. I don't really get the beef with the Times' coverage at all though. They cover literally the same points as TPM. No idea what leads them to say that the coverage is "more egregious and spurious than you’re probably able to imagine."
TPM:
The attacks aren’t just “like” the Swift Boat attacks from 2004. They’re literally the work of the same guy. Chris LaCivita was the strategist who ran the Swift Boat attacks in 2004 and cut the commercials. He’s now the co-manager of the Trump campaign.
NYT:
But Mr. Vance’s comments were also reminiscent of the “Swift boat” attacks in 2004 that effectively cast doubt on the military exploits of Senator John Kerry, then the Democratic presidential nominee. A key strategist behind those attacks, which helped doom Mr. Kerry’s bid for the White House, was Chris LaCivita, who is a senior strategist for the Trump campaign.
TPM:
The overriding point here is that Walz didn’t just say, well, I might get deployed. I’m outta here. It is well-documented that he was already planning to run for Congress, had been discussing with fellow guardsmen for some time whether he would retire as part of his plans to run for Congress and in fact had already announced his run months before he retired.
NYT:
But Joseph Eustice, a 32-year veteran of the national guard who led the same battalion as Mr. Walz and served under him, said in an interview on Wednesday that the governor was a dependable soldier and that the attacks by his fellow comrades were unfounded . . . Mr. Eustice recalled that Mr. Walz’s decision to run for Congress came months before the battalion received any official notice of deployment, though he said there had been rumors that it might be deployed.
WE DID IT!!
Man this story is a confused mess. It's like detailed descriptions of how the call up would happen and how many people are needed. Then every third paragraph completely negates everything:
However, a spokesman later clarified that no call-up was being considered.
"We are still discussing what should happen if they don't come voluntarily," he said.
But later a spokesman for the ministry appeared to deny any kind of coercion was involved, and said "accents were shifted" in the interview.
"There is no discussion on the agenda of a call-up from abroad," Illarion Pavlyuk said, quoted by Ukrainian media.
Uh... what?
Some important missing context: Netanyahu is thankfully not going to be around to have any say over this.
source