[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I was about to argue with you and toss out a bunch of ad hominems on you, but then I looked it up and by golly you’re right. I’m one of the 10,000 today it seems.

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, for sure. Like I said, I get the difference. But ultimately we are talking about injury prevention. If automated cars prevented one less death per mile than human drivers, we would think they are terrible. Even though they saved one life.

And even if they only caused one death per year we’d hear about it and we might still think they are terrible.

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

When cars first started being mass produced it wasn’t just Ford doing it. There were like 50 manufacturers, big and small.

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Same people who did No Man’s Sky, in case anyone was wondering like me. Looks good!

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

There is essentially no way we are the only ones in the entire universe. It would have to be the most astounding and amazing luck for that to be the case…. Vanishingly small, might as well be zero, chance of being the only ones. The universe is an absolute monster in size. There is no way for our monkey brains to even fathom how big it is. We need abstract numbers to even talk about it, which make it so anything that could exist most likely does.

However, those extraterrestrial peers of ours may be so far away that we might as well be alone. Even if we traveled for millions of years and kept our warring civilization from destroying itself, we may only explore a small percentage of this one single galaxy. Even if we managed to catalogued the entire thing, there are still 200 billion more galaxies out there. Our alien buddies may be on one of those that will soon blip out of existence due to universal expansion before we could get there, even if we traveled at maximum speed, never to be seen or heard from again.

When we talk about actually attainable and achievable exploration goals, the chances of other intelligent life existing get sort of really small. That is what I find to be not terrifying, but somewhat depressing to think about.

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Never said the intelligences were the same, only that the use of the data is the same. Whether one AI company trawls the internet for public data or millions of users each trawl a little bit of the internet, they don’t care. They just recognize a nice deep pocket to go after for another income stream.

Non fiction and academic publishers have been gouging students and academics for years. They don’t deserve your sympathy.

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

This is an adorable show of optimism.

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Immediately thought this was a Cosmos DB wrapper.

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Could be, maybe. Or maybe not. Not sure. But the thing for sure is that forcing the diversity reduces the quality of the model.

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Is there any moderation in this joint?

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I don’t care much for Windows bloat, but if 100% of games run on Windows and even 99% of games run on Linux, I’m sticking with Windows for gaming. It’s just that simple. If that ever reverses, then I’ll switch to Linux for gaming.

[-] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

You will never get the sympathy for YouTube that you’re looking for. Not as long as the ads keep being so blatantly offensive and irrelevant, and while they continue to dangle their power over the users and content creators, who ultimately make them what they are.

No one cares about their hosting fees. You’re right that it’s expensive to keep the necessary servers and bandwidth, but you’re wrong that people will care because of the lack of care YouTube has shown. On the other hand, paying for something like HBO Max, for example, is a thousand times more justifiable. Look at the novel content they actually create. They also host that content, but that’s not why people pay.

I think people go to the ends of the earth to block ads that are offensive or irrelevant. Some people block any ad because of the history of offensiveness and irrelevance that ads from the majority of services have been. Ads can be those things for lots of reasons. Too many, too long, too often repeated, actually offensive, annoying, distracting, insulting to your intelligence, conflict of interest, against the grain of the content they infest, just to name a few… But instead of advancing that front, services like YouTube would rather just cram them down your throat, and then block you if you object. Ultimately YouTube needs users. Nothing works without the users. The ads only even make money because of the users…

They should be giving us massages and making our stay as pleasant as possible… instead they are power-tripping because they think we need their bullshit, but we don’t.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

burliman

joined 1 year ago