Dax knows the deep, dark secret kept by the Trill Symbiosis Commission. They'd be wise to leave her alone.
That is what is known as "sarcasm". I wasn't sincerely calling for violence against the Supreme Court, but rather drawing attention to their hypocrisy.
If OpenAI owns a Copyright on the output of their LLMs, then I side with the NYT.
If the output is public domain--that is you or I could use it commercially without OpenAI's permission--then I side with OpenAI.
Sort of like how a spell checker works. The dictionary is Copyrighted, the spell check software is Copyrighted, but using it on your document doesn't grant the spell check vendor any Copyright over it.
I think this strikes a reasonable balance between creators' IP rights, AI companies' interest in expansion, and the public interest in having these tools at our disposal. So, in my scheme, either creators get a royalty, or the LLM company doesn't get to Copyright the outputs. I could even see different AI companies going down different paths and offering different kinds of service based on that distinction.
- The right to make medical decisions on behalf of the other
- The right to visit the other in the hospital
- The right to make funeral arrangements for the other
- The right to survivor's benefits (veteran's benefits, Social Security, private pension, etc.)
- Income tax breaks and credits
- Tax breaks on inheritance and estate taxes
- Tax breaks on money and property transfers between spouses
- Immigration and naturalization rights
- Can't be forced to testify against the other (usually)
- Communications between married partners are privileged from discovery in civil and criminal cases (usually)
- Joint adoption rights
- Bereavement leave
- Joint bankruptcy protection
- Automatic recognition of the relationship by every state, nation, etc.
Etc. There's something like 1,000 rights, privileges, and responsibilities that attach through marriage only.
Those are gross oversimplifications that don't accurately describe either state or their populations.
So apparently this woman works for a competing (fringe right wing) book publisher. In which case Scholastic might have grounds to sue.
The actor who played Garak is on record saying that he played the character as bi, with a crush on Bashir.
If he's too crazy to be guilty, then he's too dangerous to be freed.
I am so sick an tired of the GOP manufacturing this crisis every fucking year.
I have a theoretical degree in nuclear physics, and it seems to me that sub-atomic scale events like quantum tunneling suggest that reality is neither fully determined nor fully chaotic, but something in between: probabilistic. Whether we can consciously affect the probabilities of our own actions remains an open question, but we can at least say that causality is not the whole picture.
Akshully, they tried to keep it there. Imprisoned because of its religious beliefs! Killed while attempting escape!