[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

No you won’t

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago

Cyclists: Everyone hates me, tells me to ‘get off the road,’ or if I’m not on the road, I get told to get on it. There’s barely any legal thought or consideration given to where I’m allowed to be and if I get hit or killed it’s framed as being my fault.

Attempts at creating a safe place for cyclists to be that is separate from either of these places is seen as an inconvenience to the people who don’t want cyclists on the road, or off it, and so creating lanes and bike-specific infrastructure is met with stiff opposition.

Surely a licensing, inspection, and insurance framework won’t be abused to further erode the viability of cycling in a society that doesn’t want cyclists around in the first place.

Never mind that bicycles predated cars, used to be more popular and never needed these things in that time.

Insurance, inspections and licensing of motor vehicles was created because of motor vehicles and how dangerous they are.

There are other places in the world where lots of safe cycling infrastructure exists and it’s considered normal, even desirable to commute by bike, and they don’t have or need shit like this there.

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

I think you mean why not

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

I can do no better than to second this sentiment.

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

We do have free health care, it works. It's underfunded and understaffed as a result of Conservatives trying to destroy the public services, which gets people expressing dissatisfaction with the service, which allows them to further stripmine the system by funneling public funds to private clinics and the like to 'improve things' when really they should be properly funding our public system and paying more people good wages to work there

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

Rent has doubled everywhere in the past few years. Real estate industry is to blame

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

The model we were working with has acting chops, she was actually holding the sad face for most of the 3 hrs and tearing up. Was pretty impressive.

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Thank you. Portraits are one of my favourite things to do, and it's a bit unusual to get to paint/draw a sustained facial expression from life--was fun. Hope to follow it up with another 3 hr session in a couple weeks

155
WIP portrait (sh.itjust.works)

Digital, from life, 3 hrs so far

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago

Not really slower, just more shit going on under the hood than ever before. Considering all of the novel ways to attack the operating system, the ubiquity and level of integration of computing in everything, the OS is a much higher value target than it used to be back in the days of Xp-7. However, MS has introduced numerous security features and significantly improved the built in AV. 10/11 is a hell of a lot more secure, but there is a performance cost to that. That and the software we run on top of it has only gotten more resource hungry and complex as well. There are also things that you might hate but are worlds better than they used to be. Updates are a lot faster, support automatic rollback and are practically flawless compared to the broken mess they used to be. We now have things that were never possible before, like first party tools to convert a MBR/BIOS-boot system to UEFI boot.

I'll concede the point about service advertisements, however depending on the edition that is suppressable. MS is not alone in its sinful capitalism however, MacOS is full of stuff like that too, they're just sneakier/more subtle about it. MS will have you griping about their promoted services or apps; Apple will have you licking their boots and not realizing it because you've deluded yourself. The only operating systems that are really free are the ones no company fully owns. I work with multiple different operating systems in an IT job, and the notion that it is acceptable to run old versions of Windows in this day and age or that they were objectively better is just nostalgic horseshit. It was always a corporate product, you're just chafing against that now.

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep. Bastards aren't getting my dollars for the forseeable future. Fuck em

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 179 points 2 years ago

Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho, from Idiocracy

[-] cramola@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

I object to the author of this laying all of the blame on MS. Apple software design is the worst offender when it comes to coddling users into a state of being unable to troubleshoot issues themselves, IMO. Want to discover anything more than the extremely limited options available in the GUI? Well too bad, you don't know the secret keystroke. What's that, there's literally no documentation for this CLI utility? An error occurred! Here's an incomprehensible report that looks like a dog's breakfast, good luck. Despite its BSD roots, MacOS is heinously bad in terms of user education, and it is seen as the "easiest OS to use".

view more: next ›

cramola

joined 2 years ago