[-] crashex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Very nicely put. I've used all this for deep reflection about my internetting as well and I don't think I have come to terms with everywhere being ruined by corporate. It's not like they don't fuck us over as well in the real world and I now realize what kind of fight we're in on- and offline. Don't want to give up any bit of space to evil corporations. I think it's easy to create really quiet Lemmy instances (or other social sites, federated or not) where one can rest from all those aggressive algorithms, and if I do it at some point I will make it very connected to real life and good for information gathering. Other than that, I like real life, I'm not interested in much virtual stuff.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

12k views but probably 10k are bots and the others are too busy scrolling to ever use your knowledge. And then your content is buried on someone else's platform. I think reddit (and lemmy for that case) are horrible for keeping and spreading useful information and I wonder why people see them as the best alternative.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These products - Googles convenience products as well as the Social Media shite - were introduced gradually at the time. The single steps people took towards using these products seemed innocuous. Before you know it, your whole life is enmeshed in a privacy nightmare and the convenience and quality you were used to is gone. It's like buying an apartment in a nice place of town and then within the next two decades the area turns into a shady ghetto slum.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Git seems to be a good way to approach this. It's funny that I never really had to get around to what Git actually is (some thingy to store files for programmer teams?). For a somewhat technophile but non-IT person it's all a bit overwhelming.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

All you guys think fandom type wikis. I am thinking about practical knowledge. A wiki about donkey care can very well need a quick link to a wiki about medicinal plants, and wikis about adjacent practical topics, or think for example car tuners and motorbike tuners - they might like to have different wikis but will have lots of similar or equal topics. Wouldn't a federated wiki mean it can be better protected from attempts of centralized censorship?

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is what I mean. Lots of small wikis, like subreddits, like the old forums, only that a wiki setup seem to me a better way to collect and present knowledge than the forums, mailing lists, facebook groups, subreddits or wherever we used to put our stuff.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

What does the 'blockchain' component do? Not sure what it means compared with a regular platform.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds cool. Does that mean we need heavy disks full of data everywhere or is there a magicky way around it?

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I would want, for example, be capable of easily linking between the info for a particular plant in my botany wiki and my herbalism wiki. But I don't want to overwhelm the botany wiki contributor with a heavy list of medical input fields when he enters a new article.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Can you explain what this does like I'm 5 please?

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Is there an explanation for stupid of how SearXNG works? I tried it for a while after getting too frustrated with the Google enshittification, but couldn't get results really.

33

I keep feeling frustrated as valuable knowledge for my different hobbies over the last years became siloed away in corporate social media. I believe wikis could be a way out, but can we have decentralized, federated wiki software that can kind of talk among each other?

view more: next ›

crashex

joined 1 year ago