[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 53 points 1 year ago

capitalism preys on insecurity 🤷‍♂️

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 42 points 1 year ago

lol I didn't realise it had been released

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 54 points 1 year ago

everything I don't like is woke, a guide for basic dickheads

Here we go again

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 40 points 2 years ago

a study is helpful to show anyone who argues for those policies

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 47 points 2 years ago

let that sink in.

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 37 points 2 years ago

amazing.

need to disprove the accusation of racism?

just tell everyone it's a Jew conspiracy.

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 39 points 2 years ago

how do I set my version to European

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 44 points 2 years ago

but you need to hit it with a hockey stick otherwise the science doesn't happen

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 44 points 2 years ago

to be fair that happened a lot before AI existed

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

right? "sync users never shut up"

meanwhile my feed:

edit: and three posts down:

we get it you don't like sync, I'm just trying to find content in an app i enjoy 🤷‍♂️

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 46 points 2 years ago

I think it's just because it's so easy to browse again, I'm just seeing a lot more stuff

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 42 points 2 years ago

According to the simulation apparently it only works if the copper atoms end up in an unlikely place in the crystal, so fabrication might be unreliable. I recall someone in another thread saying the authors themselves had around a 10% success rate. So other efforts to replicate are likely to see more failures until the fabrication is better understood. Makes sense I guess.

The fact that another team saw something I think is really hopeful, even if it's hard to produce and poorly understood, if there is a room-temp effect then it's only a matter of time before it's studied properly and understood. From there hopefully a reliable method of fabrication can be published.

If there is no effect replicated anywhere then the paper is fraud, but if there's any effect replicated then it's just a matter of study and engineering to figure out what it is. It would be interesting even if it isn't exactly room temp superconductivity.

114
1
80

It's pretty well made even if it's designed to promote a security company

4

It feels like they’re two different roles. It might be better to have user-orientated servers that prioritise federation of content and only have a couple of meta-style communities, and other servers which prioritise being the go-to place for discussion on a particular topic and less a place that manages a large number of user accounts.

It just seems like two really distinct roles all servers are trying to do at the same time, and it’s leading to larger sites with a lot of users duplicating all the same subs, rather than there being any particular spot for certain types of discussion.

It also means the server hosting a particular type of discussion might defed certain instances to prevent trolling when it’s a sensitive topic, but it wouldn’t affect a large userbase who have that as their home server, it would only be moderating the discussion for the content areas they specialise in.

Thoughts?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

dbilitated

joined 2 years ago