[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 4 months ago

we'll get there, comment by comment! Or not.

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 4 months ago

he could have just said "as he calls himself", but nooo

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 4 months ago

must be woke mind virus, we don't even acknowledge race and iq, smdh

28
Why I'm leaving EA (forum.effectivealtruism.org)
40
1
[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 5 months ago

I’ve been spending a lot of time lately walking around outside talking to GPT-4o

and it loves me very much, I just need to send it money for its ticket over via western union

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 5 months ago

i remember reading on a Right Stuff forum a guy detail why even different varieties of white people genetically couldn't get on and then say "I'm not even racist." at that point i realised there were no racist statements in the english language

107
64
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by dgerard@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

WE DEMAND A CORRECTION TO uh various minor nitpicks

also we swear we totally didn't get your email

bonus from thread:

I am having a lot of fun on Manifold, but if the team insists on inviting eugenics speakers to conferences, its probably time for me to leave :-/

What exactly is your objection to people exercising their bodily autonomy to implement voluntary eugenics?

1
1
1
1

j f c

56

Women have two niches in life: looking beautiful and making babies

The first niche will be taken by sexbots

The second by artificial wombs

Society will suddenly realize it doesn't need women and those in power will quickly start replacing and disempowering them.

People like to consider the positive implications of technology but they don't like to consider the negative implications

The smart strategy for women would be to ban ALL of the following:

  • sexbots
  • artificial wombs
  • trans women

Nobody except women should be allowed to look sexy(feminine sexy), look female or bear children.

To some extent TERF women like @jk_rowling are smart enough to realize that it's essential to defend the female monopoly on this stuff. But the average woman just isn't strategic enough to go along with this, and there's (as always) a collective action problem so you get defectors.

1

by Amy Castor and David Gerard

In this episode:

  • Ethereum front-runners get front-run

  • Coinbase looks to play CeFi games (and re-enact 2022)

  • Uniswap refutes SEC accusations by detailing why they're true

  • Telegram's TON adds Tether

  • Custodia Bank is still trying again, and we seem to be the only people in crypto to notice that Lummis' stablecoin bill is a loophole written for Custodia

  • Money laundering, Binance, FTX, Craig Wright and all sorts of other fun.

We also have a life-sized cardboard cutout Sam Bankman-Fried, for all your many, many life-sized cardboard cutout Sam Bankman-Fried needs.

1
[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Torres has written about that hit piece! It's the only article on that substack, "Mark Fuentes" doesn't appear to exist, the material was partially published under another name first, the material ultimately originated in the EA forums, and the article is a favourite of EA attempted astroturfers.

anyway, that's the quality of article that titotal just happens to reach for first

he's just using it as an example of a supposedly well-written and convincing article about Torres you understand, and just happened to pick an odious lump of slander that originated in that very forum

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

FHI was basically funded by one guy, James Martin - a computer millionaire. (His Wikipedia article misses the source of his wealth, but he owned a private island and the Oxford Martin School donation was the largest single donation in Oxford University's history.) He died in 2013. Its days were numbered at that point. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/about/founder/

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 18 points 7 months ago

the culture war is VERY BIG on this one, I am sorry to have informed you

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

ACAB and abolish prisons, but we can leave finance cops and SBF until quite late in the process

come the fabulous gay luxury space communism future, when scarcity itself becomes all but obsolete, we will absolutely have to make it clear that, at the mind-buggeringly long and rambling cadre meetings discussing the disbursement of the few items that remain restricted, Sam's opinion is not invited

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 18 points 8 months ago

loved how Metz is literally just explaining his job in terms that make obvious sense, and the commenters go off to construct a stupendous conspiracy theory

also, like. we have the email where Scott confesses that he started SSC to promote reactionary ideas and race science. Zack has even posted about said email.

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 8 months ago

Funded by Thiel, so more on topic here than we might like

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

btw, this is the top mind who previously asked "where's the economic incentive for wokism coming from?"

he's also the cofounder of CFAR, in case anyone ever tries to make out he isn't a normative rationalist

view more: ‹ prev next ›

dgerard

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF