But it does matter. Maybe not to you directly, but the January 6th treason attack was a direct result of his influence. Obviously people who follow him are massive bell ends, but they still matter and they still vote. America's democracy is far from perfect, and has definitely struggled to cope over the past few years, but it put him in the most powerful position in the world for four years and despite all the evidence, enough people are still supporting him that a second term still can't be ruled out.

It beggars belief, it really does, but you really should care about it and a single person being a martyr has historically changed the world.

Why does America have so many really old politicians?

Be nice if the browser version auto loaded images like most apps do.

Not quite but it's not black and white. Rocky is owned by Rocky Enterprise Software Foundation, but that is owned by Greg Kurtzner because a legal entity needs to be owned by /someone/ in law.

I personally trust him because I know a little of his story and his involvement with Centos before Rocky (ie, he cofounded it), but I appreciate that might not be enough for everyone. I've followed the project closely since its inception and am very happy with its progress and outlook so far, solely from a non-commercial aspect.

And Alma is NOT better. That's like saying Cheese is better than Apples, or Titanium's better than Lead. They're different distros with quite different approaches. It's fantastic both of them entered this market and both of them are doing well, choice is the absolute best thing about Foss.

(More detail about Rocky's legal makeup here, if you're interested) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocky_Linux - I also have no commercial interest in it other than a user)

They announced something similar back in 2020 with a working title of "Liberty Linux", so maybe that.

As long as you set up SPF and DKIM records on your mailserver, you’ll never get marked as spam.

Sorry - that's factually incorrect. If your IP is on a residential block, you'll be downscored. If you're on a dynamic IP, same again, but weighted even more harshly, by pretty much every antispam service. In addition, every commercial service is very secretive about what methods they use, for good reason, so you cannot claim with any accuracy that "you just need to do this $thing to get read". (Although I do agree the original post is not well researched, knowledgeable nor particularly useful to anyone)

SPF and DKIM are essential to getting your email out, but it's not the only thing, and sometimes no matter what you do do, your hit rate is going to be low.

Source: Me. Been running mail servers privately and commercially for over twenty years. Before then, I ran fidonet and netmail services through the 90s and into the tail end of the 80s. There's many things I know bugger all about, but email is not one of them. (And if anyone's interested what I do for personal email now - I use gmail, because it works and maintaining it is somebody else's problem)

AI's been in use in commercial anti-spam for quite a while now - and on the flip side is also being used by the spam senders. Just another front on the unending war.

But spam (and phishing, and all malware) happens because humans get fooled by it. No reason to think AI will be any smarter.

War for the overworld. I have thousands and thousands of hours logged.

Any work-issued device should be used for just work, right? Surely that's common sense?

I know what you mean about "it feels a bit ruined" - I had to post something for work there today (a technical question that I felt was best suited there), the first time I've been on for two weeks. It kinda felt like I was visiting a porn site - that same shifty feeling that I hope nobody notices it was me.

It is a real shame, but when you sit back and think about it - it's just a website. It's not really that important compared to other things, so I'm generally finding better things to do, like you are. Doing that, for whatever reason, is a good thing.

Totally agree. Really do not want this to become too popular, because then you get bots, fraud, fake news, trolls and shitposting. Being too small to interest those guys is a good thing.

Nah, it's fine. Boot times are considerably faster than sys.v in most cases, and it has a huge amount of functionality. Most people I work with have adopted it and much prefer it to the old init.d and sys.v systems.

People's problem with systemd (and there are fewer people strongly against it than before) seem to break down into two groups:

1. They were happy with sys.v and didn't like change. Some were unhappy with how distros adopted it. (The debian wars in particular were really quite vicious)

2. It does too much. systemd is modular, but even so does break one of the core linux tenets - "do one thing well". Despite the modularity, it's easy to see it as monolithic.

But regardless of feelings, systemd has achieved what it set out to do and is the defacto choice for the vast majority of distros, and they adopted it because it's better. Nobody really cares if a user tries to make a point by not using it any more, they're just isolating themselves. The battle was fought and systemd won it.