[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

First paragraph I fully agree. But I fail to see the point why that should'nt be true for Linux machines then. If you don't have friends/colleagues which can help you do stuff, you need to get your own hands dirty. Relying on "support" is nebulous. You cannot even call anybody from Microsoft "support".

And if you are in need of such support, there already exist solutions: https://www.tuxedocomputers.com https://system76.com/ Not sure what more you are looking for...there never will be Linux distro fixing all its problems by itself.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

There is simply no reason that a manufacturer shouldn’t be producing hardware with open specifications to a global market that consumes its product.

Are you aware of Intel scandal in regards to AMD? What do you think Microsoft was/is doing? Also if you criticism is aimed at hardware manufacturers, then this is the wrong topic for it? Linux cannot do anything about it, because it has no financial interest.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

So what are you doing when a GUI tells you "error"? You give up and do something else?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

I don't think apt is as bad as pacman, I use nala on my debian machine. The best syntax in my book has zypper, but I am biased. Simply running a flatpak from cli is a hassle. :P

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

And the money for that should come from where?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

because nobody is there to stop them, which distro maintainers are going to strip out in distro packages because it’s harmful to users.

I doubt thats really the case? Most distro maintainers mostly want to make sure a package works with their provides libs etc. If a package is malicious, it just will not become a distro package. At the same times this esoteric part about what distro maintainers actually do is so nebulous and at the same time "overrated" (debian).

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Best post so far here.

Can you elaborate why a sysadmin/IT prof. should use Nix? Or are you referring to, those people deploying Nix systems for the "masses"?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Thats the reason I hate pacman. pacman -Syu...ok.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Clicking buttons doesn't mean you understand what they do. And often time they don't do what you would think they do. CLI on the other hand is actually much more direct, because the entered command does the same thing on almost any machine and you can read about what it does with "man command".

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Linux is not the answer you seek.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

The first paragraph tells me you don't understand linux?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

not american, sorry

view more: ‹ prev next ›

dino

joined 1 year ago