[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 3 points 7 hours ago

what I appreciate (inasfar as something to laugh at) is that when this is pointed out they double down like it's their life savings riding on the game

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 7 hours ago

this has me howling with laughter, thanks

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 8 hours ago

"is it me, driveby poster, that is wrong? no, it must be everyone else who knows the sub that's wrong"

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

imagine our drivebys reading the description for the place they ~~drop one out~~ post in

difficulty: impossible

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 9 hours ago

this isn’t wikipedia, and the point of this post was not in fact the thing you think it was, you utter and complete raging fuckwit

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 9 hours ago

“no no you don’t get it, you’re floating it wrong”

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 9 hours ago

your lack of situational awareness is alarming. stop driving, grab a coffee, put your feet up, and take a moment to actually fucking look at what you replied to

it may help

1

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

1

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 24 points 3 months ago

subheading: A love story

opener: Note: I am closer to this story than to many of my others

@dgerard "congratulations" on your new stalker

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 23 points 4 months ago

you can unsubscribe. that's allowed.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 26 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately in this case the problem is you (as a non-frequenter of this sub (which is explicitly about dunking on these fools)) coming in with no context, although I’d agree with you in principle otherwise

Also it sounds like that game-EA thing could do with a sneer on techtakes

1

there is some strong copium in the article, combined with a total description of having a massive gambling addiction without, y’know, actually realising it’s an addiction

remarkable stuff

28

this time in open letter format! that'll sure do it!

there are "risks", which they are definite about - the risks are not hypothetical, the risks are real! it's totes even had some acknowledgement in other places! totes real defs for sure this time guize

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 23 points 6 months ago

Because it’s not an intelligence, it’s a machine being provided a template to operate from

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 27 points 7 months ago

changing thermometers

speechless

view more: next ›

froztbyte

joined 1 year ago