[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that movie is legit creepy as fuck.

It's a really good surreal kind of creepiness towards the end that I can definitely see having an impact on a kid. Stanley Kubrick was great.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago

None, but I saw Child's Play as a kid and it scared me for years afterwards.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes... I have no problem assuming that you are average. Thus far you responded exactly how I expect your ilk to respond. You plug your ears to truths you don't like so you don't have to think about how your consumption habits can and should change.

If you valued my opinion of you, then I would have a higher opinion of you. I don't expect that of you though, which is part of why you're average.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago

This isn't really something you can be 'too cautious' about.

Hopefully we can at least agree that as of right now, they're not being cautious enough.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago

People are angry about this?

I didn't even know he represented kindness.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago

He also puts into perspective how easily manipulated we all are.

We still give the most amount of power to the least trustworthy people. It's disgusting.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wish, but no.

For one, they would blame religion.

Barring that, they would find any other differences among us to blame.

Barring that, rich people will use their power and influence to make sure we find some way to blame each other instead of them.

The main reason why we refuse to blame rich people for our problems is because most of us want to be the rich people causing the problems. Until we can get that idea out of most of our heads, we shouldn't expect these problems to be solved.

I don't have much hope, personally.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, but I contribute to it at a level that we all can participate in so I'm not part of the problem.

If you're implying that I have to go live off in the woods or something to criticize consumerism, then you're just looking for excuses to not consume less. You've been conditioned to believe it's "all or nothing," so any mitigation of your contribution doesn't matter.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago

I guess you don't know what consumerism means, or you're not willing to admit its drawbacks because you're a part of it.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 weeks ago

The average person has difficulty admitting when they are incorrect.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes, Reagen is considerably more responsible for the current economic landscape than orange man. Consumer culture is an even bigger contributor to the disparity in wealth than any politician.

But tribalism is strong on both sides, while both sides want to believe they're above it.

It really puts into perspective how 'intelligent' the average person is these days.

[-] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks.

That seems like it would prevent tampering after a certain point, but it doesn't verify that the data hasn't been maliciously altered before the image is created.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

haloduder

joined 2 weeks ago