[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, yea. Happy to have AI as a player in the free market, the problem is that it requires a $0 salary so, kind of unbeatable as far as capitalism is concerned.

Why pay $1 to make $2, when you can pay $0 to make any number over zero? It scales infinitely, unlike the planets resources or human tolerance.

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 2 points 1 year ago

DAE feel like they woke up one day recently and “AI” suddenly has the answer to EVERY SINGLE PROBLEM EVER? Yet, nothing is getting noticeably better?

“AI” doesn’t have to work a dead end job to feed its family, or turn to alcohol because it’s lonely and scared of being forgotten. It’s training data is a curated version of the human experience based on the Internet!

It’s playing human instead of being human and ALL of its solutions will assume that’s “normal.”

Imagine a five star general googling “should I attack this country?” That’s silly right? Well that’s what’s happening. It’s just being wrapped in a way that makes it look novel.

These are algorithms designed to mimic humans. When faced with any actual controversy they must be persuaded to answer in an “acceptable” and predetermined manner.

The golden rule.

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 2 points 1 year ago

More “portable” and secure identities would have been a good feature. The client could have handled most of the crypto required for signing and validating content. As it stands now, the instance Admin has complete control over your identity. Portable communities would follow that easily.

Most of the syncing issues are actually between the large instances or instances that having performance issues.

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 2 points 1 year ago

When Palo Alto sells your dipshit CIO one firewall appliance per virtual server. “Somehow. Someway,” says the salesperson, “we’re gonna get even more firewalls in here!”

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 1 points 1 year ago

You're not misunderstanding. They just solve more than one issue, and create a few too.

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your right. You just asked what a "fake account" was though. I think it's generally accepted that if you create "alt" accounts for the sole purpose of vote manipulation, you're being a dick.

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 1 points 1 year ago

There is some discussion. https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2947

I am still fairly confident that it shouldn't be storing images, but I'll admit my pict-rs directory is growing quite fast compared to the database. Have to keep a close eye on this.

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 1 points 1 year ago

Sexy loads.

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 1 points 1 year ago

Keep in mind this is a one hour snapshot. I am working on a historical rating as well to give a better indication of overall long term stability.

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 2 points 1 year ago

Your account@lemmy.world would disappear yes, but you could create account@other.server.

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 1 points 1 year ago

If it grows fast and hard it might happen naturally. lemmy.world is suffering already.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

hawkwind

joined 1 year ago