[-] hypna@lemmy.world 78 points 3 weeks ago

Did nobody hear her say that the national guard is there to "liberate" the city from their local and state officials? It was in that very same press conference. I get that there's a lot to track right now, but that seems like a bigger deal to me

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago

When I was in high school, gay was the generic negative word. If Wendys gave you a medium fry when you ordered a large - gay. If your homie cancelled plans last minute - gay. If you slipped on the stairs and busted your ass - gay. It's bizarre in hindsight.

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

There is no way that these two didn't talk about how to answer that question before the press event. This isn't the president of El Salvador saying he doesn't want to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, it's him saying that he is on Trump's side.

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

You guys are only working on one project at a time?

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 115 points 5 months ago

There have been two court orders requiring that payments continue normally. It looks like Musk has decided that court orders do not bind him. It hasn't even been two weeks and already we're at the constitutional crisis?

4
submitted 5 months ago by hypna@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
0
submitted 5 months ago by hypna@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
7
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by hypna@lemmy.world to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world

We have the option to block posts by keyword, but communities have to be blocked explicitly by name. I'd like to be able to block all communities by keyword, or regex.

I have two use cases. The first is for communities that exist with the same name on many instances. The second is to be able block all the ".*meme.*" communities.

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

This seems like a prime opportunity for an investor lawsuit

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Well not quite that either. I don't know how to pack this up into a tidy analogy, but the issue is that some of these communication platforms have been designed in such a way that no record of the content can be accessed by a third party.

So maybe it's more like, "Please give me a transcript of the keynote speech at your murderer's convention," and replying, "Sorry I don't have a transcript." And then the government further saying, "Well then you need to let us install bugs in all your rooms," and you, the host of many different conventions reply, "No. Privacy is part of the service." I have now belabored this analogy to death. You're welcome.

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's a constitutional amendment that was ruled on. The Constitution applies the same in all states. If it were just Colorado law I think it would be much harder to appeal the ruling to the US Supreme Court.

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

A truly poor analogy. LLMs don't remove anything from anywhere. They consume no shared resource.

It's been wild watching people flail about searching for arguments for why LLMs should be stopped. I'm not even saying they shouldn't, just that I haven't seen a solid argument for it.

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean, it's an mtx-free, drm-free, full feature game. If BG3 isn't worth paying for, I don't know what is.

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

I went on that journey a couple years ago. What I ended up buying is technically considered "digital signage" rather than a TV. Basically zero bloat. You may have to pay a little extra but I don't recall it being that much. Pretty sure I got it here.

view more: next ›

hypna

joined 2 years ago