https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name

Oh, yep, that's shady and bad behavior. Thank you.

You know, I'm sure it is great. But looking around at the absolute bullshit I see with 2D printers, I'm never buying a closed source machine for 3D. People are even complaining about Brother these days, seems like only a matter of time that proprietary machines go to shit.

I don't think I would argue against this law, IDK. It's just a slap in the face to see they recognize how dangerous the thing is.

We always knew they would do nothing to legislate misinformation, bigotry, and electioneering on the US-based platforms. But now we know for a fact that they understand these platforms are weaponized against the public.

That would make sense. This current thing is one of the dumbest, most citizen-hostile laws I have ever seen, and I am saying that stuck in the US.

Yeah but that's just on YouTube and Facebook now. Nobody is going to regulate them in the slightest.

It is a slap in the face if they want to say it is too influential to have an adversarial state control it, at the same time leaving it fine for local billionaires to do the exact same things.

I would prefer score voting but I will take anything that allows me to meaningfully vote third party.

"There is far too much regulation," yeah, food safety is truly holding society back. What a utopia we would have if we could all be eating sidewalk hot plate quesadillas from a hobo with no refrigeration or sanitization tools.

I think that's the human condition. Don't studies show that most decisions are made on emotion and rationalized afterwards?

Or any shame at all. Even common crooks are appalled by pedophiles. Christians will not only shield their priests from justice, they help transition them to other churches to find new victims.

Oh, it turns out an extension cord has a side use that isn't related to its primary purpose. What's the analogous innocuous use of a semiautomatic handgun?

I wonder if what they're asking for is some sort of RBAC? All members of house A can all access content A and cannot access content B. But each individual retains distinct viewing history.