Oh c'mon man how naive can you be? Between Biden fumbling through debates that should've been child's play and constantly forgetting names, and this guy getting martyred for not getting shot in the face, I'm sorry to say but this race won't even be close.
(And that VP pick? People who are going for the main attraction called Trump aren't going to give a rats ass about the VP pick.)
Unless you bring a solution to the table, taking the position that it isn't impossible is just cheap contrarianism on your part. Sure we can try new things, but if it doesn't work and everyone is commenting the approach isn't helping, then maybe take the hint. Or not, and keep swimming against the stream (in which - seeing OP's other comments - they seem to be more interested than actually solving the problem)
I'm not American so it shouldn't concern me, but fuck you're a bunch of idiots.
That'd be something akin to lab-grown meat, and imho actually a vast improvement.
Have you tried rebooting her?
In my opinion, basic human rights such as adequate housing shouldn't be left solely to the free market. That's just asking for human rights violations.
That said I'm kind of disappointed in how black and white this issue is usually dealt with on lemmy (I get the feeling most users have the opinion: capitalism equals evil)
In my ideal society, we as a society would facilitate basic housing for people where needed. Everything above the basic necessity of a roof above your head and a place for yourself (adequate housing), I think can be left up to the free market. I think the prices of the free market would be more 'proportional' if the free market knows it can't ask ludicrous prices because there's basic housing as a safety net.
I was under the impression that the 'natural selection' part of evolution already made its non-randomness well understood. maybe this discovery is more about the mutation part of evolution?
Well technically, Czech Republic had a constitutional amendment regarding gun rights passed in 2021.
And what about suicidal people with multiple personality disorder, are they counted more than once? We need answers goddamnit!
"What we found is that consuming high amounts of ultra-processed foods could increase your risk of developing depression by up to 50%"
and
"He said that ... they cannot say highly processed food causes depression"
Those statements sound contradictory (Or do they mean that it 'could' be 50% or 0%? But if so, why say anything at all)
Schisms are just feature branches, it all makes sense!