[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

assume your talking about https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0215545/, never saw it

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I don't actually play GTA online, but they are very successful with their online offering, their daily low looks to be >60k concurrent players. I suspect it'd be VERY hard not to continue with the online bit.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

It seems kind of ok, everyone agrees that they should be teaching some finance basics. I guess I would.jave preferred to see what outcomes this has had in other places (rather than just trying random experiments on our students). It'd be nice to see if Doug could pass this test himself.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago

In my experience only kinda, and by convention (up is on), and three-way switches break this (indicator becomes the light itself).

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Skim the article, it's 20 large municipality's, nowhere is 0 mentioned

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

I could care less if it tanks

If you have a mortgage, you should care, you should probably care if you don't.

Lets imagine that a $656,6253 house were to go back to it's 2010 price, about $339,030.

If you have a mortgage you now have about 600k in debt on an asset worth 340k.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

On the "sell it like any other asset", you still have to live somewhere, those places cost money. On the "borrow against it", now you've got debt (that costs money to have), I guess your saying anyone with that much money should be able to make more money off it via leverage than they use?

When i think rich, i think doesn't have to work, but maybe that's independently wealthy.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

I hear this quite a bit, and think there's actually a good deal of nuance to it. I've seen places that insisted on comments for everything, and it was silly, a significant number of comments had no value. This made people not read comments, as opposed to other places I've worked with very few comments - when you ran across a comment you gave it more weight (something here was complex, or not as simple as it seemed).

So imo, use comments which can communicate effectively, but use them sparingly for important parts that are complicated, for the rest attempt to communicate with the code itself.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago
[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For my local team: Generally a container (docker) for local dev. My team uses go so sometimes a Makefile without docker is enough. For other teams i've mostly i see docker.

for multiple apps this can get more complicated, docker compose, or skaffold is what i generally reach for (my team is responsible for k8s clusters so skaffold is pretty natural). I've seen other teams use garden.

hashicorp makes something called waypoint which i've never used. Nix people seem to be well liked as well.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

You aren't alone. Forspoken was fun but they gated the gameplay behind a tonne of super slow paced unskippable town parts.

Maybe that's what the like about dark souls series, right in the action rarely out of it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

karlhungus

joined 1 year ago