I've never had a virus on Linux. How is Windows more secure?

Also, I have the same type of setup, make sure you have the right display driver installed for your graphics card.

Uncle fucker, you got me.

In attributing the forthcoming migrant crisis solely to Republicans stance on climate change, you're oversimplifying a complex issue. While climate change is indeed a pressing concern that could exacerbate migration patterns, it's not the only factor. My initial point was that AOC appears to be ignoring the concerns of her constituents on the current migrant issue, which is separate from future crises caused by climate change. It is crucial to address the problems of today while also preparing for those of tomorrow. To do so, our representatives should be open to debate and multiple viewpoints, not solely focused on pushing their own agendas.

You do you G, ain't gonna force my views down your throat.

You're point is valid about the two-way street that is ideological moderation, whether it's done by modders or platform moderators. While some argue that removing certain features serves to make a political statement, the same could be said for removing mods themselves. Both actions can be seen as influenced by the ideological beliefs of those making the decisions. In this case, the main question is: who gets to decide what crosses the line and what doesn't? And should these decisions be open to discussion within the community?

Finally, someone who isn't just calling one side stupid and dismissing peoples points.

I agree that platforms like Nexus Mods have a responsibility to consider the broader societal impact of the content they host. However, they also have a responsibility to preserve the freedoms that have made such platforms valuable to so many. The challenge lies in finding a balanced approach, which is never easy.

It's worth mentioning that I fully support your right to view and critique mods based on their societal impact. At the same time, it should be acceptable for others to evaluate these mods based on different criteria, such as user freedom, without being labeled as "bad persons."

Would it not be more constructive for us to have an open dialogue on how to balance these competing interests rather than dismissing each other's viewpoints outright?

When a mod is removed entirely, the choice is taken away from everyone, limiting the overall freedom for customization. The aim should be to find a balanced approach that respects both individual freedom and community guidelines.

I acknowledge they have a freedom not to host the mod. But, coming from someone who's used Nexus Mods for the past 6-7 years, it's sad to see them start to take this route. We can have a mod to kill children but god forbid we have a remove pronouns mod.

I'm stating my own opinion on the situation, I'm not forcing them to reupload the mod. I'm just trying to debate with you guys. Would you like to debate or no?

Exactly this. It's a game guys, not real life.

Who though? Who is the fascist?

How does this apply to Rogan?

What about when Martin Luther King created his movement? That's just dumb to say man.