[-] lily33@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't know - but I'm willing to get the instances where people were saved weren't calls from anonymous voip numbers.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago

Not really. It seems to use a very different technology from termux.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oh, in that case we don't need to read either - just run a simple grep!

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Because it's not a very easy case. In fact, there is no real case.

  1. It's not just a stretch, but a huge leap, to claim that using "he" or "she" counts as "instruction [...] on sexual orientation or gender identity".
  2. And even if you did manage that, you also have to argue that it's also "not age appropriate".
  3. And if you managed that as well somehow, you have the problem that judges can take into account things like the intent of the lawmakers, and what's reasonable, not just the raw text of the law.
[-] lily33@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Well, if you want me on Mastodon, implement a personalized recommendation feed. Until then, corporate platforms are the only option.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

Well, people like to think that the fediverse is a genuine threat to Meta. And they like to feel they're doing important work defending it from Meta. So this will indeed pop up again, and again, and again.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

That's not very deep. Closer to plain old logistic regression, really.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Since I'd firmly oppose such a war, I'm going to assume I was elected in a backlash against it.

So I'll just exit immediately, and instead make an agreement with another, non-invading, democratic country to help with rebuilding (using my country's money). I'll sign international treaties admitting the criminal nature of the invasion, pledge reparation, and agree never to do it again. Then start speed-signing disarmament treaties.

I assume I myself would get ousted at some point in this process though.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Since I don't think this analogy works, you shouldn't stop there, but actually explain how the world would look like if everyone had access to AI technology (advanced enough to be comparable to a nuke), vs how it would look like if only a small elite had access to it.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I think you misread the OP.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

While I'm sure some people hate snap in general, most people simply hate being forced to use it. Or rather, bring forced to switch distro and reinstall everything.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

It's a somewhat immutable distro, that is however fully configurable.

  1. The configuration is all in one place. No more changing a bunch of files in /etc, some in /lib, etc, and having to remember all files you've changed.
  2. You can easily recreate your system from your configuration or boot to older configuration.
  3. You can easily open shells with different programs available. Very useful for development, when you need a reproducible environment with the project's specific dependencies.
  4. Very hard to learn, but if you have learned it well, a lot of things become easier than in other distros.
view more: ‹ prev next ›

lily33

joined 1 year ago