Anyone know what kind of minimum requirements does it need for reliable performance? I couldn't find them in their docs.
for a browser which constantly has security vulnerabilities and fixes, it's still late. So I use the DivestOS F-Droid repo. It updates within the day of release.
Translation:
I really liked what I saw in #KDE but due to my habit with .deb packages I think I'll do better in a distro based on @debian
They have the ability to deal with violations in house
riiiiiiight, no bias at all in that. Hey, we investigated ourselves and found we are not liable to war crimes we commit abroad. how bloody fucking convenient.
Good job at giving Russia an excuse to be free of consequences when it finally loses in Ukraine. They're probably going to make a case that they don't need to have international boards be used against them too, no?
Things like this just screams "I'm one of the good guys now" and probably "check my new book/course/patreon/podcast/tweets to read more about shitty things I did."
money in, money out
Thats good to hear. Thanks for checking. Graphene OS team did an amazing job with their OS.
does split screen work with custom launchers in Graphene OS? I use Neo Launcher on my Pixel (stock) and split screen doesn't work at all.
love the name.
They weren't lying when they said "Might makes right"
In this age of Internet, they still control the narrative, even with so much evidence brought to light. If you don't seek it out, it seems like nothing noteworthy is going on.
History is still mostly written by the victor, with truth waning in the distance. The victor being evil never mattered. "Human rights" these countries exclaim so often doesn't extend when their kins are doing the killing.
Apple reverse-engineered Office to release iWork. So Apple isn't new to reverse-engineering others proprietary shit when it benefits them. something, something, history lesson, hmm…
I don't know laws in the US but my limited understanding in the case of Beeper is that its users are the ones that grant themselves unauthorized access to the Apple servers. Beeper is a tool that packages pypush to accomplish it. So Apple should sue all the Beeper users?
As an example, there are tons of tools to exploit vulnerable systems in Linux. Metasploit is a penetration testing software and can execute exploits on old unpatched systems. I don't think anyone is suing Metasploit developers for Computer Fraud and Abuse aCt. The users who use it are responsible for the access of unauthorized services and broken ToS.
If Apple thinks Beeper users are exploiting its servers, they should patch them (which they did).
Beeper did try to monetize it, so i'm not sure how it fairs but Beeper is not forcing anyone to gain unauthorized access. Beeper even welcomed Apple to audit Beeper mini code.
And I'm sure Beeper has a legal team that analyzed these scenarios better than anyone of us. And Apple has sued companies for less. They'd have done it the moment the app landed on appstore. They could have crushed it before gaining any attention.
Again, I have no idea how legal it is. I have both Apple and android devices and never use iMessage. But you gotta hand it to Beeper devs. That's some old school hacker shit and I'm here for it.
I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Graphics card got way more expensive than the PC I had.