Nazi: ~~I mean,~~ But why skulls, though?
Hans: What?
N: Why skulls?
H: Well, maybe they’re the skulls of our enemies.
N: Maybe, but is that how it comes across? It doesn’t say next to the skull, you know, “Yeah, we killed him but trust us, this guy was horrid.”
H: Well, no, but... ~~I mean, what do skulls make you think of?~~
N: I mean, what do skulls make you think of? Death, cannibals, beheading, erm pirates?
H: Pirates are fun!
N: I didn’t say we weren’t fun, but fun or not, pirates are still the baddies. I just can’t think of anything good about a skull.
H: What about pure Aryan skull shape?
N: Even that is more usually depicted with the skin still on, whereas the allies-"
H: You haven’t been listening to ally propaganda. ~~They’re bound~~ Of course they're going to say we’re bad guys.
N: But they didn’t get to design our uniforms and their symbols are all, you know, quite nice, stars, stripes, lions, sickles.
H: What’s so good about a sickle?
N: Well, nothing, and obviously if there’s one thing we’ve learnt in 1,000 miles of retreat, it’s that Russian agriculture’s in dire need of mechanization.
H: Tell me about it.
N: You’ve got to say it’s better than a skull. I mean, I really can’t think of anything worse as a symbol than a skull.
H: A rat’s anus?
N: Yeah, and if we were fighting an army marching under the banner of a rat’s anus I’d probably be a lot less worried, Hans.
Polygon's Unrivaled series, specifically Bowser's military hierarchy. It wasn't originally about kobolds if the title of the video didn't give it away.
If you have the time for all that you might as well join the striking workers outside instead of just calling in sick
In very reductive terms, yes. If you care about some of the nuances though, people don't like that changes are being made outside of the "scope" of the mod, like a bug-fix patch being used to balance the game or change the lore.
The agencies are problematic because they generally aren't allowed or don't have the budget to properly regulate things. Eliminating departments isn't going to help anything, and I really don't think the guy that picks up roadkill for a snack will improve the overall quality of food in the country.
But they did own the onions before they were sold to customers, which I think means they deserve at least some fault here.
In the United States, a straw purchaser of a firearm at a federally licensed firearm dealership who lies about the identity of the ultimate possessor of the gun can be charged with making false statements on a federal Firearms Transaction Record, which is a felony. Note that in this case, purchasing the item for another person is ipso facto illegal, regardless of that person's status as a legal possessor.
I guess if you're buying up a lot of guns with the intent to resell/distribute them, that would count as straw purchasing.
Even if it's a joke, how wrong are you?
But new research points to a striking pattern: Higher premiums are being charged in states where regulators apply less scrutiny to requests for rate increases, compared with states where officials question the justifications offered by companies and try to keep rates low, the data show.
Not what I was expecting to read, but not that surprising either.
Only if you remember your PIN number.