253
submitted 3 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world

Not sure where the official announcement of this happened, but videos and discussions of the game are now finally allowed. The game is still invite-only, but expect to start seeing it all over the place now. Popular streamers are already jumping into it.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 89 points 3 months ago

Having the game streamed by all these huge channels before it's even officially announced is kinda crazy. Everyone wants to play Valve's "secret game" of course, so it's free marketing. Pretty clever.

[-] doodledup@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

Valve doing their Valve thing.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

So Valve specializes in controlling the rate of release?

[-] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 55 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There may be more people watching Deadlock than there are watching and playing Concord today based on available data and reasonable extrapolation. Valve continues to market in a unique way that works.

[-] simple@lemm.ee 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Concord is dead on arrival. Kind of a shame, the game looked a bit interesting but being $40 and having very generic art this was bound to happen. Deadlock is in a whole other league.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Agreed. Why would they force you to pay 40 in a genre already overpopulated and most of them are free.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It’s basically impossible to increase the price tag on a game like that, and if you go free, the design pivots to a lot of abusive monetization systems. People run into that at the 10th hour of any free game.

It might be failing for a lot of reasons - I don’t think that one is necessarily their mistake though.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago

Honestly, paying for a (primarily) multiplayer game isn't a problem for me. I actually might prefer it when you look at Overwatch vs Overwatch 2. But I wasn't about to sign up for a playstation account to play my Steam game.

[-] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

You're talking like ow2 isn't literally the same game. I paid for ow1 and can't go back to it.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

I think that's what makes it such a good point of comparison though. It's titled differently and we were promised it would be different, but all that really happened was they changed their monetization tactics. And maybe it's just nostalgia, but I remember liking Overwatch when it came out, but now I have almost zero interest in playing Overwatch 2, even though I've gone back to it a few times just to give it a try.

[-] ngwoo@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It's likely that Concord's lifetime peak will be lower than Deadlock's closed beta peak

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I mean, I did not even know a game called Concord exists.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Thank you for that

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Deadlock eh, never heard of it. Seems to be a valve Overwatch?

[-] simple@lemm.ee 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's dota 2 if it were a very competitive 3rd person shooter. More of a MOBA than a hero shooter, and it's very complex. Also I've been playing it for a month, AMA I guess

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago
[-] simple@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

Yup, it's very fun.

[-] cowfodder@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Ask you anything? Can I have an invite?

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

!deadlock@sopuli.xyz

Somebody posted that community, maybe invites there

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 17 points 3 months ago

It is like Overwatch and Leaguen of Legends/Heroes of the Storm had a baby.

It is a FPS MOBA.

[-] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

Not an FPS, but a 3rd person shooter.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

Close enough :P

[-] drphungky@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Everyone calling it a shooter MOBA is right, but more basically: It's Smite. It's just Smite, but good. I played the Smite 2 alpha and it was very lame, no verticality, gunplay felt bad. Deadlock has an original theme, gunplay feels tight, and there is clearly a huge skill ceiling. I don't know if it's 100% yet, which tracks cuz it's an alpha, but it's already better than Smite and I have faith they'll make it better.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No. More a third person Battleborn, actually. Or Dota with guns. It has items, ability leveling, hero leveling, lanes, NPCS, all the MOBA things.

And no, Battleborn never played like Overwatch.

[-] 100@fedia.io 16 points 3 months ago
[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not for everyone, but it has fit surprisingly well into the Battleborn-shaped hole in my heart.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Yeah I’m for new games and hopefully people love it but “hero shooter” and “moba” definitely aren’t categories I’m looking for in new games, the market is flooded with them. Hopefully valve can stand out

[-] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I really wanted battleborn to succeed on release even though it was just kind of flawed from a design standpoint. I kind of gave up on competitive fps games since then though.

With how chaotic the fights look like and how high the ttk looks to be, is the game still fun at lower-mid skill levels?

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago

Deadlock or Battleborn?

I'd say yes. But you do have to figure out how to apply the MOBA way of thinking. How to stack the stats of items, abilities and leveling up, into doing a shitload of damage without dying.

That applied to Battelborn, and it does in Deadlock, too.

[-] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I was specifically asking how Deadlock felt.

I've played quite a bit of MOBA's before, coincidentally the other big third person ones Smite and Paragon, so I've got a decent feel for builds and macroplay and I'm not necessarily worried about those aspects.

I grew up as a console gamer but exclusively play on PC now so I've found for fps games I have trouble competing because my aim isn't as great.

[-] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago

I think Overwatch is kind of dog shit and would take that game over Deadlock every time. May as well just skip the shooter and play DOTA.

[-] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Just fyi, I saw this posted in the announcements channel of their Discord server that you can join from the game's main menu.

[-] Celsiuss@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Announcement was on Discord

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
253 points (98.8% liked)

Games

32674 readers
441 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS